Rewarding Work & Great Team - Recensione dipendente - Team Member presso Reach Strategies

I value quality work and I take pride in mine! I find myself challenged in the best way that has led to professional growth. I appreciate the transparency of not only business operations but also the work we collaborate on as a team. Accountability is a must to be successful at REACH which speaks to the level of professionalism the team holds. I've learned a lot about EVs and clean energy and will continue to learn in the future.

Some former employees lacked the strong work ethic needed to be accountable for their time and the quality of their work, leading to substandard deliverables. As a result, turnover at REACH can sometimes be high through no fault of the organization.

Healthcare benefits are solid. The only real positive was the people I met—many of whom had similar negative experiences. A number of us have stayed connected afterward and support each other, which says a lot about what it was like to work there.

Leadership culture is deeply problematic. Employee concerns are often dismissed or reframed in ways that feel like gaslighting. Comments from leadership can make you question your own judgment, even when the issues are obvious. Extremely high turnover. I personally counted well over a dozen employees who either left or were let go within a relatively short window. That level of churn is not normal and should be a red flag to anyone considering joining. Performance management is disorganized and inconsistent. Expectations shift, documentation is sloppy, and processes lack transparency. Micromanagement is intense—down to tracking time in small increments—which creates a culture of surveillance rather than trust. Workflows are chaotic. Feedback and edits are scattered across multiple platforms (Google Docs, Slack, etc.), making it difficult to keep track of direction or priorities. There is a pattern of overpromising in proposals and expecting teams to deliver work that isn’t realistically scoped or resourced. Decision-making is highly top-down. Senior leadership sets direction but pushes execution challenges onto middle managers and staff without adequate support. The environment is stressful to the point of being unhealthy. I experienced significant physical effects from the stress, which ultimately led me to leave.