Great Mission Bad Culture - Recensione dipendente - Sales and Operations Representative presso SOURCE Global

3,0
5 ott 2022
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Those who are not in managerial positions are some of the most interesting and brightest people you'll get a chance to meet. The mission behind the company is very strong. Great opportunity learn about a really interesting product and industry.

Svantaggi

For anyone that has worked here, they know the culture is really awful. Many people are overworked, underpaid and treated unfairly by c-level management. The company has a top-down approach to their culture, where management makes decisions without the input of anyone else. When decision making is siloed like this, it results in bad decisions across the organization and employees who are faced with tasks that are not possible or don't make sense with what they are seeing day to day. A pillar of the company is "yes if", meaning you are encouraged to find a solution no matter what problem you are given. While this sounds nice in theory, it forces many employees to say "yes" when they really don't have the capacity to take on more tasks. If you are looking for a leadership role where you can make real change and develop better processes, I would highly suggest looking elsewhere. If you are someone who likes to be told what to do, this is a great opportunity for you.

Esplora altre recensioni su SOURCE Global

5,0
26 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Great team to work with and amazing technology

Svantaggi

still in research and development stages with some areas

3,0
3 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

They tried their best. Cool product, fun people.

Svantaggi

They focused too much on optics, making it seem like we’re a globally deployed, successful technology. But globally distributing your hard physical assets is a nightmare logistically particularly when they break constantly. I don't feel leadership took responsibility for the criticality of the defects. Instead, the problem was allowed to be diffuse. And it was a game of whack-a-mole.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto