Least supportive most cut throat startup with questionable ethics - Recensione dipendente - Operations presso SiteRx

1,0
1 mag 2022
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Good pay, remote work, select few of good people

Svantaggi

Disorganized train wreck of a company that sets you up for failure from day 1. They do not want you to succeed. You either sink or swim. You will have no guidance and support from day 1, no training and will be expected to be perfect after your first week. A lot of big personalities that just say things to hear their own voice, but really say nothing at all and if you don’t fit in you will be ostracized. And don’t even get me started on business ethics because all they see are $$$

Esplora altre recensioni su SiteRx

5,0
18 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

An invigorating culture with dedicated and inspiring coworkers who are easy to work with

Svantaggi

Hours can get hefty at times

1
1,0
21 gen 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The mission for the company is good.

Svantaggi

Coming from the legal department, I observed multiple practices that were deeply concerning from both a healthcare ethics and compliance standpoint. There were repeated situations that raised serious questions about legality, accountability, and governance. The executive leadership team is fundamentally misaligned with the rest of the organization. Decision-making at the top often felt disconnected, inconsistent, and uninformed by the realities of day-to-day operations. Policies, particularly around PTO and benefits for lower-level employees, were changed multiple times with little transparency, creating instability and eroding trust. Leadership frequently said one thing and did another. Opportunities for growth were extremely limited. Rather than developing talent, leadership allowed certain directors, particularly within the patient and call center teams, to operate without oversight. These individuals created toxic environments, spoke about employees in an unprofessional, almost high-school manner, and ultimately drove out more than 15 staff members. Several leadership roles appeared to be filled based on personal relationships rather than qualifications or performance. For example, overseeing a department of 40+ employees and representing a core function of the company requires proven leadership and operational expertise, not unrelated prior experience. This lack of qualification directly impacted morale, retention, and departmental effectiveness. Additionally, poor management within call center operations led to significant inefficiencies, slowing patient funneling and costing the company substantial revenue. These issues persisted despite being visible and correctable. Overall, the company prioritizes personal connections over merit, consistency, and accountability.

4
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto