Stryker Neurovascular, Fremont, is a toxic workplace for Clinical Research. - Recensione dipendente - Senior Manager presso Stryker

2,0
17 gen 2022
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Stryker (parent company itself) is reputable. Compensation is competitive

Svantaggi

Clinical Research in Fremont: Gender and Race Bias. Toxic work environment. 80:20 rule is 5:95 here. 5% people do the work for 95% who indulge in politics 100% of time. Poor leadership . Led by non-clinical personnel. No clinical leader wants to work here for more than a couple of years. Avoid at all costs.

Esplora altre recensioni su Stryker

5,0
30 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Freedom to run your own business with an ethical company

Svantaggi

Interview process is long and daunting

3,0
17 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The individual contributors you work with are fantastic people and the products we work on are really interesting and have significant impacts on patient care.

Svantaggi

Sports Medicine has unfortunately changed from a dynamic and collaborative group to one being led by toxic leadership. Rather than working together and trusting team members, they now have an in group and out group. If you’re in the in group, you can say anything you want without being questioned and be automatically trusted even when your track record says otherwise. If you’re in the out group and your message doesn’t align with what the leadership wants to hear, then you are automatically wrong and not to be trusted.

4
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto