Lied in job description, micro-managed and talked down to, ignored by HR - Recensione dipendente - Dipendente anonimo presso The Washington Post

2,0
9 giu 2017
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Always something going on to poke your head into.

Svantaggi

1. I was lied to in the job description as to what I was doing. The job description listed out 5-7 different responsibilities I had, but I ended up having just one responsibility that allowed for extreme micromanaging and boring redundant tasks. I ended up being a secretary to senior management rather than ever being able to share ideas, brainstorm or work as a team. 2. I was lied to about my time schedule. I know I am not the only one this has happened to. I was told 9-5, but ended up having to basically work 'on-call'. 7am-3pm, 12-9pm. 3. The 3 highest ups in our department had worked together for 9+ years. Everyone else on the team was 2 years or less. The 3 basically ran a dictatorship of the department - never took in anyone else's ideas, was extremely passive aggressive to lower level staff, expected everyone on the team to read their minds. It allowed for a great bonding experience to all mutually dislike the management, but I can see why there is high turnover. The only time I saw someone succeed was when a new young (white) girl who was able to bond over with a manager over food & shopping habits was taken on board. She noticeably dropped the ball on many tasks, missed deadlines, and was always aloof. However, because of this 'bonding', she was given more responsibility faster than others taken on board at the same time. 4. There were many extremely inappropriate run-ins both me and other lower-lever staff had. When I quit, I brought all of the issues, at the request of my team, including proofs in the form of texts & emails, to HR. Before I even got to talking, HR told me that they couldn't do anything unless it was a 'serious issue' - aka something illegal. They wouldn't even bring my concerns to the head of the department... So for whoever is commenting on these Glassdoor reviews creating the illusion that you care - I was told upfront already that you don't.

avatar
Risposta di The Washington Post
9y
We're so sorry you a had a negative experience at The Washington Post both on your team and with HR. It may seem futile now, but we really do care and take reviews seriously. We'll make sure our senior management sees your feedback. If you have any more details to include that would be helpful, please do e-mail us at life@washpost.com. We'll keep your comments confidential. Thanks again for letting us know.

Esplora altre recensioni su The Washington Post

5,0
12 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

THE BEST INTERNSHIP EVER! The staff and manager was so nice

Svantaggi

Nothing bad to say at all tbh

1,0
25 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Supporting journalism is the one good thing.

Svantaggi

The culture needs improvement, with a strict in-office policy that may not work well for everyone. There also seems to be ongoing challenges with employee retention, which can impact team morale, consistency, and long-term stability. The tech guild and unions made me feel really uncomfortable with coworkers protesting outside the office.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto