Mediocre for the most part - Recensione dipendente - Senior Software Engineer presso The Washington Post

3,0
29 set 2021
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The Subscriptions org has wonderful leadership, particularly the director and QA lead. What you ship will be seen by millions of readers, and technical ownership is strongly encouraged. You will own a substantial part of the site and be responsible & accountable for all work related to that domain.

Svantaggi

Compensation is mediocre, we're understaffed and unable to attract and retain talent. No equity, bonuses, or annual increases. Diversity & inclusion initiatives were shallow and insincere. Newsroom/product management set priorities and tech investment is not one of them. Most projects have more to do with internal politics than shipping a great reader experience. We have a lot of boring projects like migrating an app from Angular to React, splitting repositories, migrating AWS infrastructure from one account to another, etc. On-call for most teams, especially backend, can be a terrible experience with a lot of fires to put out.

Esplora altre recensioni su The Washington Post

5,0
12 mag 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

THE BEST INTERNSHIP EVER! The staff and manager was so nice

Svantaggi

Nothing bad to say at all tbh

1,0
25 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Supporting journalism is the one good thing.

Svantaggi

The culture needs improvement, with a strict in-office policy that may not work well for everyone. There also seems to be ongoing challenges with employee retention, which can impact team morale, consistency, and long-term stability. The tech guild and unions made me feel really uncomfortable with coworkers protesting outside the office.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto