A strange and disappointing experience - Recensione dipendente - Campus Privacy Analyst presso UCSF Health

1,0
26 nov 2020
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

I do not think that many of the people who were there during the time I was there (prior to 2016) remain. Those that do have been relegated to their appropriate niche.

Svantaggi

At the time I worked there this department was a strange clique. The chief officer, the person making HR-like decisions, and one or two young sycophants seemingly conspiring to keep themselves employed in roles beyond their abilities. The low-level politics might have been tolerable for some, but their paranoia was tedious to navigate for an endless rotation of temporary analysts. The office space was very run down. It was a comically odd environment that has fortunately changed (I think).

Esplora altre recensioni su UCSF Health

5,0
2 lug 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Close-nit community; if looking for direct patient engagement, you get it as a volunteer

Svantaggi

Just when obtaining badge, the communication between the badge department and volunteer department could be better. Since times I have gone in, the badge department said they didn't get the form but volunteer department said they sent it.

1,0
6 apr 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The people that work at UCSF are some of the most intelligent analysts I've ever worked with in 15 years of Health IT. Most are ex-Epic employees with strong backgrounds in project managament and IT,

Svantaggi

UCSF recently decided to reclassify all remote employees as "Felxible" without their input or permission. As a result, employees must now travel to the office WITHOUT expenses paid. This means that flights, hotels, etc. are NOT reimbursed and are paid by the employee. UCSF has not answered to what problem they are trying to solve with this, and refuses to answer how this action aligns with goals such as sustainability (carbon emissions), equity (women and disabled are more impacted by eliminating remote work), working accommodating (UCSF does not have the physical space for all of the Clinical Systems department to be on site. There is no locked storage or accessible workspaces.), safety (there is no shuttle for UCSF to all locations that have been mentioned for work). UCSF limits employee growth, by eliminating actual promotions with "role based work". In other words, you have to do more work without compensation for it. They have also completely reneged on remote management, meaning that most employees are now at a dead end.

2
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto