Toxic culture with retribution and exploitation attitude - Recensione dipendente - Dipendente anonimo presso Verisk

2,0
25 nov 2025
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Work life balance is good if you don't want to grow and are content being complacent.

Svantaggi

1. No strategic vision across the entire organization. 2. The different business pillars have no communication among them. 3. Technology office can suck the life out of you for bare minimum salary they pay. 4. If you're looking for growth but also love to enjoy your life, do NOT work for Verisk. 5. Health benefits are really bad, with no help from HR on the explanation of benefits. The medical plans do not provide in detail information as to what you're enrolling for beforehand. 6. No benefits for employees for being outdoors, healthy, no tie-ups with the museums, educational places for families, reimbursements of gym memberships or health tracking devices, etc. 7. Not enough diversity in the company. 8. Very very few women in the leadership roles, and as low as zero in the technology pillar. 9. No budgets for trainings/educational material. 10. People are afraid to speak up because of the retribution tendencies. All in all, if you like to sit around your desk pretty much all the time without enjoying your life or without spending quality time with your family, Verisk is a good place to work at.

Esplora altre recensioni su Verisk

5,0
1 lug 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The people are awesome, the culture is strong, and they are terrific career opportunities.

Svantaggi

Getting a little too “doing more with less” happy at the moment

2,0
30 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The people. I worked with genuinely talented, hardworking colleagues who showed up for each other and for the work, even when leadership made that hard.

Svantaggi

Leadership at the senior level was chaotic and unclear, and it trickled down into everything. Projects routinely landed with little to no notice, leaving teams scrambling instead of planning. Budgets were micromanaged from the top while strategic direction was not — a strange mix of tight control over spending and almost no clarity on priorities. Communication from senior leadership rarely made it down to the people actually doing the work, so teams were often the last to know about decisions that directly affected them. There was also a clear undercurrent of fear among some senior leaders that discouraged any real innovation or experimentation — better to play it safe than propose something new. If you're someone who thrives on clarity, planning, and a culture that rewards new ideas, this is not that environment.

1
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto