The work is interesting but pay and benefits are inferior - Recensione dipendente - Principal Technical Writer presso Verisk

3,0
20 gen 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Fascinating work Great colleagues Very smart people

Svantaggi

Since AIR was completely absorbed by Verisk our benefits have dwindled. AIR had no deductible, no coinsurance health insurance. The Verisk plans are high deductible with high out of pocket expenses. The company claims they pay 70% of health costs, but that’s not true. They pay 70% of the premium. The coverage is so bad that they really pay about 50% of costs. In addition, starting in 2026, they’ve reduced the amount of time off for employees who’ve been with the company > 7 yrs. We went from a total of 30 days of PTO (25 vacation, 5 sick) to 25 days, with no distinction between vacation and sick.

avatar
Risposta di Verisk
3mo
Greetings, thank you for your input. We appreciate your feedback and are delighted to hear about your positive experience working with us, especially alongside colleagues who are experts in their field! We also understand that the recent updates to sick time and paid time off may feel impactful. These changes were communicated by leadership to help ensure all employees were aware, and we appreciate you sharing how they’ve resonated with you. If you have additional questions or would like to discuss total rewards further, our Benefits Team is available through the Employee Self Service portal. Thank you again for offering your perspective.

Esplora altre recensioni su Verisk

5,0
1 lug 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The people are awesome, the culture is strong, and they are terrific career opportunities.

Svantaggi

Getting a little too “doing more with less” happy at the moment

2,0
30 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The people. I worked with genuinely talented, hardworking colleagues who showed up for each other and for the work, even when leadership made that hard.

Svantaggi

Leadership at the senior level was chaotic and unclear, and it trickled down into everything. Projects routinely landed with little to no notice, leaving teams scrambling instead of planning. Budgets were micromanaged from the top while strategic direction was not — a strange mix of tight control over spending and almost no clarity on priorities. Communication from senior leadership rarely made it down to the people actually doing the work, so teams were often the last to know about decisions that directly affected them. There was also a clear undercurrent of fear among some senior leaders that discouraged any real innovation or experimentation — better to play it safe than propose something new. If you're someone who thrives on clarity, planning, and a culture that rewards new ideas, this is not that environment.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto