OK - Recensione dipendente - Field Representative presso Verisk

4,0
22 gen 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

- Company car. - Travel expense. - Visit interesting places and operations. - Autonomy - PTO

Svantaggi

- Corporate/Political management. - Continuously overassigned work. - Limited advancement.

avatar
Risposta di Verisk
4mo
Thank you for taking the time to share your review. We’re glad to hear that you value the benefits such as the travel opportunities, PTO, and the autonomy in your role. It’s great to know these aspects have contributed positively to your experience. We also appreciate your candid feedback regarding management, workload, and growth opportunities. We recognize that experiences can vary, and insights like yours help us stay aware of how our environment and processes are perceived across different teams and roles. If you have specific suggestions on how we can further enhance our processes, please feel free to share them with your manager or HRBP or through our internal feedback channels, such as the Employee Engagement Survey.

Esplora altre recensioni su Verisk

5,0
30 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The commitment to flexibility and hybrid work is amazing! The US has a very robust benefits offering. There are several learning and development programs with a diverse range of offerings from self-paced training to more interactive live courses. The people are incredible, you will not find nicer company.

Svantaggi

Verisk is an environment for "do-ers". This is a great place to build your career if you have great work ethic and are motivated to ty new things.

2,0
30 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The people. I worked with genuinely talented, hardworking colleagues who showed up for each other and for the work, even when leadership made that hard.

Svantaggi

Leadership at the senior level was chaotic and unclear, and it trickled down into everything. Projects routinely landed with little to no notice, leaving teams scrambling instead of planning. Budgets were micromanaged from the top while strategic direction was not — a strange mix of tight control over spending and almost no clarity on priorities. Communication from senior leadership rarely made it down to the people actually doing the work, so teams were often the last to know about decisions that directly affected them. There was also a clear undercurrent of fear among some senior leaders that discouraged any real innovation or experimentation — better to play it safe than propose something new. If you're someone who thrives on clarity, planning, and a culture that rewards new ideas, this is not that environment.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto