I left to work for a competitor, but returned 6 months later. A great place to work. - Recensione dipendente - Dipendente anonimo presso Verisk

5,0
6 gen 2015
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Outstanding healthcare & other benefits! Progressive and diverse culture! Good work-life balance, great compensation and great opportunities for career advancement! Collaborate with other brilliant minds! Learn and grow in-role! An all-around good deal great company!

Svantaggi

Verisk is continuously growing, as a company grows there are bumps in the road as far as changes but they always figure it out quickly. Change is always bound to happen, they try to make the process as easy as possible.

avatar
Risposta di Verisk
11y
We're very happy to have you back! You are right, change is not easy and we're always looking for ways to manage it better. The reality is that in this era, if you are not growing, your dying, so either way, change is constant.

Esplora altre recensioni su Verisk

5,0
30 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The commitment to flexibility and hybrid work is amazing! The US has a very robust benefits offering. There are several learning and development programs with a diverse range of offerings from self-paced training to more interactive live courses. The people are incredible, you will not find nicer company.

Svantaggi

Verisk is an environment for "do-ers". This is a great place to build your career if you have great work ethic and are motivated to ty new things.

2,0
30 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The people. I worked with genuinely talented, hardworking colleagues who showed up for each other and for the work, even when leadership made that hard.

Svantaggi

Leadership at the senior level was chaotic and unclear, and it trickled down into everything. Projects routinely landed with little to no notice, leaving teams scrambling instead of planning. Budgets were micromanaged from the top while strategic direction was not — a strange mix of tight control over spending and almost no clarity on priorities. Communication from senior leadership rarely made it down to the people actually doing the work, so teams were often the last to know about decisions that directly affected them. There was also a clear undercurrent of fear among some senior leaders that discouraged any real innovation or experimentation — better to play it safe than propose something new. If you're someone who thrives on clarity, planning, and a culture that rewards new ideas, this is not that environment.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto