“Great place” is just a gimmick - Recensione dipendente - Research Scientist presso Verisk

2,0
13 ott 2022
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

This is a place to start a career for people without other options; mostly recently graduates from second tier universities in need of visa sponsorship. The work isn’t really demanding. Most people leave after 2 years or when they find something better.

Svantaggi

Constantly having to react to new “priorities”, as the road map for mode development changes on a whim. Constantly having to pick up work from people who left; no documentation, no explanation, lots of bad legacy code. Crappy benefits. They used to have good insurance and then that got taken away. Meager salaries. The yearly increase is only 2%. No advancement. Promotions are few and far between.

Esplora altre recensioni su Verisk

5,0
30 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The commitment to flexibility and hybrid work is amazing! The US has a very robust benefits offering. There are several learning and development programs with a diverse range of offerings from self-paced training to more interactive live courses. The people are incredible, you will not find nicer company.

Svantaggi

Verisk is an environment for "do-ers". This is a great place to build your career if you have great work ethic and are motivated to ty new things.

2,0
30 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The people. I worked with genuinely talented, hardworking colleagues who showed up for each other and for the work, even when leadership made that hard.

Svantaggi

Leadership at the senior level was chaotic and unclear, and it trickled down into everything. Projects routinely landed with little to no notice, leaving teams scrambling instead of planning. Budgets were micromanaged from the top while strategic direction was not — a strange mix of tight control over spending and almost no clarity on priorities. Communication from senior leadership rarely made it down to the people actually doing the work, so teams were often the last to know about decisions that directly affected them. There was also a clear undercurrent of fear among some senior leaders that discouraged any real innovation or experimentation — better to play it safe than propose something new. If you're someone who thrives on clarity, planning, and a culture that rewards new ideas, this is not that environment.

1
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto