Lots of potential but not making the most of it - Recensione dipendente - Dipendente anonimo presso Verisk

2,0
6 lug 2023
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Verisk has a lot of good things going for it, both in terms of internal resources and its products. The focus on DEI is very strong and the employee networks seem well-run. Pay is pretty competitive.

Svantaggi

This is the most exclusionary, cliquish workplace I have ever encountered. Rules are enforced unevenly, "outsiders" are treated unfairly, and sometimes work-related information is withheld from people who aren't in the "in group." The fact that many in leadership not only buy into but reinforce this favoritism is extremely frustrating. Also, in my time at Verisk I've seen a number of small layoffs and a bunch of people who are managed out of the company. This may not be a good place to look for long-term stability and growth.

avatar
Risposta di Verisk
2y
Thank you for sharing your feedback. We will take it into consideration as we identify how we can evolve our support of employees in career progression. In fact, because of employee feedback and participation in the most recent engagement survey, we invested in numerous programs to promote from within the organization.

Esplora altre recensioni su Verisk

5,0
1 lug 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The people are awesome, the culture is strong, and they are terrific career opportunities.

Svantaggi

Getting a little too “doing more with less” happy at the moment

2,0
30 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The people. I worked with genuinely talented, hardworking colleagues who showed up for each other and for the work, even when leadership made that hard.

Svantaggi

Leadership at the senior level was chaotic and unclear, and it trickled down into everything. Projects routinely landed with little to no notice, leaving teams scrambling instead of planning. Budgets were micromanaged from the top while strategic direction was not — a strange mix of tight control over spending and almost no clarity on priorities. Communication from senior leadership rarely made it down to the people actually doing the work, so teams were often the last to know about decisions that directly affected them. There was also a clear undercurrent of fear among some senior leaders that discouraged any real innovation or experimentation — better to play it safe than propose something new. If you're someone who thrives on clarity, planning, and a culture that rewards new ideas, this is not that environment.

1
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto