Poor compensation - Bad Work-Life Balance - Recensione dipendente - Senior Software Developer presso Verisk

1,0
27 set 2023
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Nice team members, long time employees

Svantaggi

- severely under market pay - managerial insistance that "company culture" makes up for poor pay - despite offering full, successful WFH during covid, has reverted back to archaic multiple RTO practices with no increase in compensation - traffic is terrible coming into jersey city so average commute is 1-2 hours (2-4 hours lost per day)

avatar
Risposta di Verisk
2y
Thank you for sharing your feedback. Your input helps us identify how we can evolve our support of employees in employee compensation. When it comes to compensation and benefits, our work is never done. We continuously review our compensation packages and the market to support Verisk’s performance culture. Change is an essential part of any growing and successful organization, and it creates opportunities for others. We remain committed to our growth strategy and vision to become the strategic data analytics and technology partner for the global insurance industry.

Esplora altre recensioni su Verisk

5,0
30 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The commitment to flexibility and hybrid work is amazing! The US has a very robust benefits offering. There are several learning and development programs with a diverse range of offerings from self-paced training to more interactive live courses. The people are incredible, you will not find nicer company.

Svantaggi

Verisk is an environment for "do-ers". This is a great place to build your career if you have great work ethic and are motivated to ty new things.

2,0
30 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The people. I worked with genuinely talented, hardworking colleagues who showed up for each other and for the work, even when leadership made that hard.

Svantaggi

Leadership at the senior level was chaotic and unclear, and it trickled down into everything. Projects routinely landed with little to no notice, leaving teams scrambling instead of planning. Budgets were micromanaged from the top while strategic direction was not — a strange mix of tight control over spending and almost no clarity on priorities. Communication from senior leadership rarely made it down to the people actually doing the work, so teams were often the last to know about decisions that directly affected them. There was also a clear undercurrent of fear among some senior leaders that discouraged any real innovation or experimentation — better to play it safe than propose something new. If you're someone who thrives on clarity, planning, and a culture that rewards new ideas, this is not that environment.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto