Great place to start - Recensione dipendente - Software Engineer presso Verisk

3,0
19 giu 2024
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Great learning environment. No overtime work, hybrid work in 2024.

Svantaggi

There is no career structure in tech. As a developer I do full stack, QA, UI Design, I design and control the cloud resources covering the our products, database management, etc. As a developer you handle all things tech. I got hired as a base developer, and after 5+ I have the same title. There is no career growth, and I was shut down when I mentioned a title raise.

avatar
Risposta di Verisk
2y
Hello, thanks for your input. We appreciate your insights on career development opportunities at Verisk. Your career development is important, and we are committed to tools and resources to support you. With the new launch of Career Framework, we are excited to provide more structure to all roles across Verisk. If you were unable to attend the informational sessions, on Career Framework, we high encourage you to reach out to your manager, your HR Business Partner, or the Talent Development team to learn more.

Esplora altre recensioni su Verisk

5,0
30 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The commitment to flexibility and hybrid work is amazing! The US has a very robust benefits offering. There are several learning and development programs with a diverse range of offerings from self-paced training to more interactive live courses. The people are incredible, you will not find nicer company.

Svantaggi

Verisk is an environment for "do-ers". This is a great place to build your career if you have great work ethic and are motivated to ty new things.

2,0
30 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The people. I worked with genuinely talented, hardworking colleagues who showed up for each other and for the work, even when leadership made that hard.

Svantaggi

Leadership at the senior level was chaotic and unclear, and it trickled down into everything. Projects routinely landed with little to no notice, leaving teams scrambling instead of planning. Budgets were micromanaged from the top while strategic direction was not — a strange mix of tight control over spending and almost no clarity on priorities. Communication from senior leadership rarely made it down to the people actually doing the work, so teams were often the last to know about decisions that directly affected them. There was also a clear undercurrent of fear among some senior leaders that discouraged any real innovation or experimentation — better to play it safe than propose something new. If you're someone who thrives on clarity, planning, and a culture that rewards new ideas, this is not that environment.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto