Working at Verisk - Recensione dipendente - Purchasing Administrator presso Verisk

5,0
19 dic 2024
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Verisk really supports my role, helping me to expand my career prospects and my purchasing knowledge has increased immensely since I joined almost 2 years ago. The company encourage creativity and are always open to new strategies and ideas and they also offer many learning opportunities.

Svantaggi

The downside is there can be really busy periods and deadlines to meet, but I wouldn't really call this a downside as it is natural to have these times and although pressure increases there is still support and help where needed and we work together as a team to achieve the results needed.

avatar
Risposta di Verisk
1y
Greetings, thank you for sharing your thoughts about your time at Verisk. We appreciate your feedback and are delighted to hear about your positive experience working with us. Your acknowledgment of our culture is truly encouraging. We are so happy to hear that you are pleased with Verisk's support of your career growth. We take your feedback seriously. As a result of feedback received through leadership from employees and the most recent engagement survey, we implemented a series of improvements, enhancements, and innovations to our learning and development programs.

Esplora altre recensioni su Verisk

5,0
1 lug 2026
Dipendente anonimo
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The people are awesome, the culture is strong, and they are terrific career opportunities.

Svantaggi

Getting a little too “doing more with less” happy at the moment

2,0
30 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The people. I worked with genuinely talented, hardworking colleagues who showed up for each other and for the work, even when leadership made that hard.

Svantaggi

Leadership at the senior level was chaotic and unclear, and it trickled down into everything. Projects routinely landed with little to no notice, leaving teams scrambling instead of planning. Budgets were micromanaged from the top while strategic direction was not — a strange mix of tight control over spending and almost no clarity on priorities. Communication from senior leadership rarely made it down to the people actually doing the work, so teams were often the last to know about decisions that directly affected them. There was also a clear undercurrent of fear among some senior leaders that discouraged any real innovation or experimentation — better to play it safe than propose something new. If you're someone who thrives on clarity, planning, and a culture that rewards new ideas, this is not that environment.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto