Believe the Hype - Recensione dipendente - Business Analyst presso Verisk

5,0
28 apr 2025
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Friendly, inclusive, forward looking company that genuinely supports employees. The onboarding process has been comprehensive and open to feedback on where improvements could be made. The company was recommended to me by a friend/former colleague.

Svantaggi

As with all global companies (offices in the US, India, Europe and elsewhere) experiences will vary by location and team.

avatar
Risposta di Verisk
1y
Greetings! We were so thrilled to read your review. We're delighted to know that you find Verisk to be friendly, inclusive, and supportive. It's wonderful to know that our comprehensive onboarding process has been beneficial and that you feel comfortable providing feedback for improvements. Your positive comments are greatly valued and motivate us to continue fostering a supportive and forward-looking environment. If you have any further suggestions or concerns, please feel free to reach out to our HR team.

Esplora altre recensioni su Verisk

5,0
30 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The commitment to flexibility and hybrid work is amazing! The US has a very robust benefits offering. There are several learning and development programs with a diverse range of offerings from self-paced training to more interactive live courses. The people are incredible, you will not find nicer company.

Svantaggi

Verisk is an environment for "do-ers". This is a great place to build your career if you have great work ethic and are motivated to ty new things.

2,0
30 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The people. I worked with genuinely talented, hardworking colleagues who showed up for each other and for the work, even when leadership made that hard.

Svantaggi

Leadership at the senior level was chaotic and unclear, and it trickled down into everything. Projects routinely landed with little to no notice, leaving teams scrambling instead of planning. Budgets were micromanaged from the top while strategic direction was not — a strange mix of tight control over spending and almost no clarity on priorities. Communication from senior leadership rarely made it down to the people actually doing the work, so teams were often the last to know about decisions that directly affected them. There was also a clear undercurrent of fear among some senior leaders that discouraged any real innovation or experimentation — better to play it safe than propose something new. If you're someone who thrives on clarity, planning, and a culture that rewards new ideas, this is not that environment.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto