More cons than pros - Recensione dipendente - Innovation Specialist presso Verisk

2,0
20 lug 2025
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Good benefits including generous paid time off, 6% 401(K) match, insurance Fully remote role

Svantaggi

there was always a looming fear of layoffs from my first month of employment until the day finally came. Lack of direction, support, and clarity from senior management with constant reorgs No opportunities for advancement

avatar
Risposta di Verisk
10mo
Thank you for taking the time to share your experience. We’re glad to hear that you’ve found value in our benefits, remote work flexibility, and overall support for employee well-being. These are key areas we continuously strive to strengthen. We also appreciate your feedback regarding leadership and career development. We recognize the importance growth opportunities, and we’re committed to ongoing improvements that support our team’s success. Your insights are important to us, and we’re grateful for your perspective.

Esplora altre recensioni su Verisk

5,0
30 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The commitment to flexibility and hybrid work is amazing! The US has a very robust benefits offering. There are several learning and development programs with a diverse range of offerings from self-paced training to more interactive live courses. The people are incredible, you will not find nicer company.

Svantaggi

Verisk is an environment for "do-ers". This is a great place to build your career if you have great work ethic and are motivated to ty new things.

2,0
30 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The people. I worked with genuinely talented, hardworking colleagues who showed up for each other and for the work, even when leadership made that hard.

Svantaggi

Leadership at the senior level was chaotic and unclear, and it trickled down into everything. Projects routinely landed with little to no notice, leaving teams scrambling instead of planning. Budgets were micromanaged from the top while strategic direction was not — a strange mix of tight control over spending and almost no clarity on priorities. Communication from senior leadership rarely made it down to the people actually doing the work, so teams were often the last to know about decisions that directly affected them. There was also a clear undercurrent of fear among some senior leaders that discouraged any real innovation or experimentation — better to play it safe than propose something new. If you're someone who thrives on clarity, planning, and a culture that rewards new ideas, this is not that environment.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto