Work life balance - Recensione dipendente - Field Representative presso Verisk

3,0
29 lug 2025
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Good company - Fair workload requirements - company car

Svantaggi

No room for growth - Pays cale growth is slow

avatar
Risposta di Verisk
9mo
Thank you for taking the time to share your experience. We’re pleased to hear that you’ve found Verisk to be a good company with fair workload expectations and appreciated benefits like the company car. It’s always encouraging to know that aspects of the role and environment have had a positive impact. Career development for our team members is a priority for us, and we are dedicated to providing support, resources, programs, and avenues for growth and advancement. Your feedback on compensation is valuable. When it comes to compensation and benefits, our work is never done. If you have specific concerns or suggestions, we welcome you to contact your manager or HRBP.

Esplora altre recensioni su Verisk

5,0
30 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The commitment to flexibility and hybrid work is amazing! The US has a very robust benefits offering. There are several learning and development programs with a diverse range of offerings from self-paced training to more interactive live courses. The people are incredible, you will not find nicer company.

Svantaggi

Verisk is an environment for "do-ers". This is a great place to build your career if you have great work ethic and are motivated to ty new things.

2,0
30 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The people. I worked with genuinely talented, hardworking colleagues who showed up for each other and for the work, even when leadership made that hard.

Svantaggi

Leadership at the senior level was chaotic and unclear, and it trickled down into everything. Projects routinely landed with little to no notice, leaving teams scrambling instead of planning. Budgets were micromanaged from the top while strategic direction was not — a strange mix of tight control over spending and almost no clarity on priorities. Communication from senior leadership rarely made it down to the people actually doing the work, so teams were often the last to know about decisions that directly affected them. There was also a clear undercurrent of fear among some senior leaders that discouraged any real innovation or experimentation — better to play it safe than propose something new. If you're someone who thrives on clarity, planning, and a culture that rewards new ideas, this is not that environment.

Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto