Good work life balance - Recensione dipendente - Sr. SDET 1 presso Verisk

4,0
11 ago 2025
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

Good work life balance Great management Great products

Svantaggi

Less growth Legacy tech stack No much benefits Strict office timings

avatar
Risposta di Verisk
9mo
Thank you for sharing your experience regarding the work-life balance at Verisk. We greatly appreciate your positive feedback and are thrilled to hear that our commitment to maintaining a healthy work-life balance has positively impacted your experience. We believe that a balanced life leads to happier and more productive team members, and we’re delighted that you’ve found our initiatives effective in achieving this balance. We appreciate your insights on career development opportunities at Verisk. Your career development is important, and we are committed to tools and resources to support you. We encourage you to discuss your goals, interests, and career aspirations with your manager, HR, or explore internal resources from our Talent Development team.

Esplora altre recensioni su Verisk

5,0
30 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The commitment to flexibility and hybrid work is amazing! The US has a very robust benefits offering. There are several learning and development programs with a diverse range of offerings from self-paced training to more interactive live courses. The people are incredible, you will not find nicer company.

Svantaggi

Verisk is an environment for "do-ers". This is a great place to build your career if you have great work ethic and are motivated to ty new things.

2,0
30 giu 2026
Consiglia
Gradimento del CEO
Pronostico commerciale

Vantaggi

The people. I worked with genuinely talented, hardworking colleagues who showed up for each other and for the work, even when leadership made that hard.

Svantaggi

Leadership at the senior level was chaotic and unclear, and it trickled down into everything. Projects routinely landed with little to no notice, leaving teams scrambling instead of planning. Budgets were micromanaged from the top while strategic direction was not — a strange mix of tight control over spending and almost no clarity on priorities. Communication from senior leadership rarely made it down to the people actually doing the work, so teams were often the last to know about decisions that directly affected them. There was also a clear undercurrent of fear among some senior leaders that discouraged any real innovation or experimentation — better to play it safe than propose something new. If you're someone who thrives on clarity, planning, and a culture that rewards new ideas, this is not that environment.

1
Vedi recensioni per: Utile|Valutazione|Data|Tutto