Ho presentato la mia candidatura tramite un selezionatore. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Adyen (Singapore) nel mese di ago 2022
Colloquio
Very unprofessional interview. 1st interview was HR screening. First they re-scheduled the interview because they sent a wrong link. That link was someone else's. I think they have messed up his interview as well, by giving wrong link. When doing the interview, interviewer did not listen and didn't give any attention. he was at office desk and he was looking at the people who were moving around. If you cannot interview people, please ask someone else to do it. At least learn how to do the interviews. He had several questions prepared and the way that he asked those is really in-mature. I got the "Unfortunately" email next day, and there were no reasons to reject. Adyen you have so called values in your company, teach one or two to the interviewers.
Ho presentato la mia candidatura online. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Adyen (Madrid)
Colloquio
first step is a call with HR to align on experience and expectations, then an online coding assessment on Hackerrank of which I believe you need to answer everything perfectly to go to the next step
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
HackerRank set of exercises split in sql and solve coding problems related to the industry
Ho presentato la mia candidatura tramite un'altra fonte. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Adyen nel mese di feb 2026
Colloquio
Initial step was a 30 min screening call with someone from HR. They were very friendly. First time I didn't pass a screening call in years, make sure to study the 8 company values on their website beforehand.
Ho presentato la mia candidatura tramite un selezionatore. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Adyen (Madrid) nel mese di nov 2025
Colloquio
Madrid: good technical process, but POOR communication and lack of closure after final interview
Pros:
* The recruitment process is technically good and well-structured in its early stages.
* The initial assessment consisted of a HackerRank technical evaluation with a programming exercise focused on performance, object-oriented design, and three SQL questions, which felt relevant and fair.
* This was followed by a technical interview discussing the assessment results and deeper system/design topics.
* I also had a hiring manager interview and a technical leadership interview, both of which were professional and engaging.
* Throughout most of the process, the recruiter was very responsive, usually replying within 48 hours.
Cons:
* After completing the final interview, communication abruptly stopped;
* I attempted multiple follow-ups via email and phone without receiving any response.
* Only after reaching out to one of the technical leaders I had interviewed with did the recruiter reply, stating she would call — but that call never happened, and communication stopped again.
* The lack of closure after reaching the final stage felt unprofessional and inconsistent with Adyen’s publicly stated values around transparency, ownership, and respect.
