Ho presentato la mia candidatura tramite segnalazione di un dipendente. La procedura ha richiesto 2 settimane. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Adyen (Chicago, IL) nel mese di apr 2024
Colloquio
Given a take-home assessment with a 2 hour time limit. Completed assessment and passed all given unit tests.
A week later met with engineer at Adyen to go over THA results and answer some technical questions unrelated to THA. Felt interview went well.
A few days later received an automated email saying I failed the previous interview due to some nit-picky reasons of things I missed that were never mentioned by my recruiter or the assessment itself (i.e. lack of unit tests even though company provided ~20 hidden unit tests via hackerrank).
Overall the interview process itself was straight-forward, but I feel slightly in the dark here as had I known about miscellaneous extra requirements needed I would've done them during the take-home assessment.
Ho presentato la mia candidatura online. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Adyen (Madrid)
Colloquio
first step is a call with HR to align on experience and expectations, then an online coding assessment on Hackerrank of which I believe you need to answer everything perfectly to go to the next step
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
HackerRank set of exercises split in sql and solve coding problems related to the industry
Ho presentato la mia candidatura tramite un'altra fonte. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Adyen nel mese di feb 2026
Colloquio
Initial step was a 30 min screening call with someone from HR. They were very friendly. First time I didn't pass a screening call in years, make sure to study the 8 company values on their website beforehand.
Ho presentato la mia candidatura tramite un selezionatore. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Adyen (Madrid) nel mese di nov 2025
Colloquio
Madrid: good technical process, but POOR communication and lack of closure after final interview
Pros:
* The recruitment process is technically good and well-structured in its early stages.
* The initial assessment consisted of a HackerRank technical evaluation with a programming exercise focused on performance, object-oriented design, and three SQL questions, which felt relevant and fair.
* This was followed by a technical interview discussing the assessment results and deeper system/design topics.
* I also had a hiring manager interview and a technical leadership interview, both of which were professional and engaging.
* Throughout most of the process, the recruiter was very responsive, usually replying within 48 hours.
Cons:
* After completing the final interview, communication abruptly stopped;
* I attempted multiple follow-ups via email and phone without receiving any response.
* Only after reaching out to one of the technical leaders I had interviewed with did the recruiter reply, stating she would call — but that call never happened, and communication stopped again.
* The lack of closure after reaching the final stage felt unprofessional and inconsistent with Adyen’s publicly stated values around transparency, ownership, and respect.
