Ho presentato la mia candidatura tramite un selezionatore. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Apisero
Colloquio
There were a total of 5 rounds of interview, starting with a written test followed by 4 (1:1) discussions around software development essentials and primary skill review. Felt it was a really good interview process to measure the capabilities of the candidate in different aspects of the software development.
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
Rest, cloud computing and primary skill related questions
Ho presentato la mia candidatura tramite un selezionatore. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Apisero
Colloquio
Pre-screen on call done by recruiting team
1. bare essentials round of 30 min on generic questions.
2. first technical round on tibco bw as I am from tibco background.
3. second technical round with CEO.
4. HR discussion
Ho presentato la mia candidatura tramite un selezionatore. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Apisero (Poona) nel mese di dic 2020
Colloquio
Interview process was vague. I think interview is being conducted for being in lime light. The first two rounds were on c++ and data structures which went really well as it was healthy discussion. Also i informed recruiter that i dont have working experience in some domain, for which he agreed by saying that most of people get to learn these things after joining Apisero.
Third round was of 5-6 min and after conveying several times that i dont ave domain knowledge interviewer keep on asking question in same thing and after 5 min told that we could not proceed with your candidature.
It was complete wastage of time being involved in written exam of 1 hour and two technical rounds of 30 mins each.
It was conveyed earlier that I have not worked in particular area, then it should have been cleared during the first round or even during screening of resume.
It was really a waste of time and effort.