Ho presentato la mia candidatura tramite un selezionatore. La procedura ha richiesto 2 settimane. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Asana (San Francisco, CA) nel mese di dic 2019
Colloquio
Fast process. I talked to the recruiter and one week later had a phone interview. I got feedback two days later and my onsite interview took place 10 days later.
Domande di colloquio [4]
Domanda 1
Design an LRU cache. Describe the data structures involved and the complexity of each cache operation
Given an array of integers, return an array of integers of the same length, in which each item i is the product of all elements of the input array except item i. e.g Input: [1,2,3,4], Output:[24,12,8,6]
Design a jigsaw puzzle algorithm, given a Piece class, a Side class containing sideTypes, and a helper function which returns whether or not two pieces are a match
Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Asana (San Francisco, CA)
Colloquio
HR intro call was typical questions about resume, experience, and goal fit. I didn't get pass this round of the process unfortunately. Seemed like it was a formality call since I had a referral.
Ho presentato la mia candidatura online. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Asana nel mese di mag 2026
Colloquio
Initial screening went well and I felt genuinely excited about the opportunity. The technical interview itself was different from what the preparation PDF described — less collaborative, minimal engagement from the interviewer's side. I didn't receive any feedback after the session; the interviewer went on sick leave and I waited several weeks before receiving a rejection email.
I'm fine with rejection — that's part of the process. What was harder was the uncertainty and the lack of feedback. The prep materials set clear expectations around collaboration and communication, and the actual experience didn't match that.
Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Asana nel mese di feb 2026
Colloquio
Overall, it was a good experience. There was one interviewer who acted standoff-ish and strange. But, for the most part, it was conducted very professionally.
What I didn't like was the Systems interview question, which is a very specific modelling problem and unless you've worked on building such a feature, it's unlikely that you'll recognize such a pattern and come up with a decent solution. And for a mid-level position, it's quite surprising. But I guess they gotta justify the high comps somehow. Also, infrastructure knowledge is not tested at all in this interview, which is atypical.
The coding interviews were great. Study typical LLD problems. Leetcode is minimal and simple. Focus on understanding patterns and not memorizing solutions.
The HM interview was great. He probed in ways typical EMs have never done before, and it gave me a really good impression of the company and his team, despite also not passing this interview, which I take full responsibility for.
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
Tell me about a time you experienced mentorship, as a mentor or a mentee