Applied for the position online, via the Atlassian site. Received an email a few hours later requesting that I do an online coding test. The test was quite simple - three multi-choice questions about the Java language (they were quite technical), and two coding questions. For each question, there was some pre-generated code, along with an unimplemented class, which I was required to implement. The first question involved modifying an algorithm to be iterative instead of recursive. The second question involved flattening a (poorly designed, I felt) tree. I was told to expect a response within two to four days - after five, I had not received a response, so I called them, and some hours later, I was told that I had been invited to an in-person / Skype coding test. As I was in Sydney that day, I was able to take the test in-person. This second test involved sitting with an Atlassian employee and improving an event listener/publisher model, with unit tests. Given the choice of Windows or OSX, and Eclipse or IDEA. The tasks were not particularly complex, and I made it through to the final question, which my interviewer said she had not seen before (or possibly just very rarely seen). Several days later (no follow up required on my part), I was invited to an on-site interview with two senior Atlassians (both team leads, I believe). This was scheduled to take an hour and a half, and could have been done either via Skype or in-person. As I was, again, in Sydney on that day, I did this in-person. This interview covered a project I had worked on. I was asked to sketch out several details about the architecture on a whiteboard, and I was asked how I would improve on it given the opportunity (e.g. if I was starting from scratch, what would I do differently), along with various other questions. Towards the end, I was asked how I kept up-to-date on new technologies, and what sort of other technologies I worked with. I was ultimately declined as they felt that I had worked in an "insular" technical environment (which is true), that I had not been exposed to modern technologies or good development practises (which is not necessarily true, though it could easily have been that I had not had *enough* exposure), and that they did not get a good feel for my technical curiosity (I feel that I easily have enough, but I clearly didn't convince them of that, partly because I didn't realise how important it was for them). I also suspect that part of it was that, while I applied for a Software Developer position, I was interviewing for a Senior Developer position, and I suspect that I would have been a better fit for a non-senior position. Overall, it was a positive experience, and it has not put me off perhaps looking to apply again in the future.