Passa al contenutoPassa al piè di pagina
  • Lavori
  • Aziende
  • Stipendi
  • Per le aziende

      Migliora la tua carriera

      Scopri le tue potenzialità di guadagno, trova lavori da sogno e condividi approfondimenti su lavoro e vita privata in forma anonima.

      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Canonical

      Azienda coinvolta

      Chi siamo
      Recensioni
      Stipendi e benefit
      Lavori
      Colloqui
      Colloqui
      Ricerche correlate: Recensioni su Canonical | Offerte di lavoro di Canonical | Stipendi di Canonical | Benefit di Canonical
      Colloqui di CanonicalColloqui per Executive Assistant presso CanonicalColloquio di Canonical


      Glassdoor

      • Chi siamo
      • Contattaci

      Aziende

      • Account Business gratuito
      • Spazio per le aziende
      • Blog per le aziende

      Informazioni

      • Aiuto
      • Linee guida
      • Condizioni d'uso
      • Privacy e scelte pubblicitarie
      • Non vendere né condividere le mie informazioni
      • Strumento per l'accettazione dei cookie

      Lavora con noi

      • Inserzionisti
      • Carriere
      Scarica l'app

      • Cerca:
      • Aziende
      • Lavori
      • Località

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Glassdoor LLC. "Glassdoor," "Worklife Pro," "Bowls" e il relativo logo sono marchi registrati di Glassdoor LLC.

      Aziende seguite

      Non lasciarti sfuggire opportunità e informazioni privilegiate seguendo le aziende dove vorresti lavorare.

      Ricerche di lavoro

      Ricevi suggerimenti e aggiornamenti personalizzati avviando le tue ricerche.

      Colloquio per Executive Assistant

      1 set 2023
      Candidato anonimo a colloquio
      Sydney
      Nessuna offerta
      Esperienza negativa
      Colloquio facile

      Candidatura

      Ho presentato la mia candidatura online. La procedura ha richiesto una settimana. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Canonical (Sydney) nel mese di ago 2023

      Colloquio

      If you wrote your degree on Assessment Centres, you would know that Canonical’s talent acquisition (TA) process couldn’t be further from best practise and isn't lacking contradictions: 1. Using a test that isn’t any predictor of competency: Canonical is referring to Thomas’ assessment as “significant factor” in their decision whereas if you read carefully a Thomas report, it states: "there are no good or bad profiles based on GIA scores, as both high and low scores can be suitable for different job roles”. 2. If testing, why not use a proper one? As stated by Thomas, their tests aren't any predictor of competency. Eg.Thomas task: visualise and turn the letter R around in your mind. I’m sure many bright candidates had passed proper intelligence tests that might be some indicator of skills. (Personally, I passed Procter & Gamble's 1 hour Maths & Statistic assessment, which at the time was only passed by 20% of attempters.) Why should you feel inferior based on the Canonical approach using an irrelevant test? 3. Measurement/Feedback and Communication A proper TA process starts with defining what Success means. It continues with Communicating that to the candidates. It ends with giving Specific Feedback after Each task. None of the Canonical TA steps will tell you upfront what Success means. And you won’t get Specific Feedback after each their tasks either. Why? See below. 4. Peers as Hiring Leads? You can read hundreds of interview feedbacks with Canonical team sitting bored and incompetent at interviews (they don’t read resumes, don’t read the written interviews prepared by candidates, etc.) And even if they did, who would want to hire a candidate, who has a better profile & experience than they do? Wouldn’t a ‘better' candidate mean a threat to the peer? As such, the current level of ‘expertise' is the ceiling of Canonical’s (un)professionalism. It’s a self destructive mechanism. 5. Are you one of the claimed ’60,000 candidates’/month? Give thanks if you are not in a situation where you need to work for Canonical with a 3.3 review score from this site! This TA practise continued as is, will contribute to further brand damage & will erase their remaining reputation.

      Domande di colloquio [1]

      Domanda 1

      Context Outline your thoughts on the mission of Canonical. What is it about the company's purpose and goals which is most appealing to you? What do you see as risky or unappealing? Why do you most want to work for Canonical? What would you most want to change about Canonical? What gets you most excited about this role? What support would you need from Canonical to be successful Experience Please outline your most relevant experience for this role. What are the key attributes of an outstanding executive assistant? Please describe a situation where you had to hold firm on a difficult issue. What is different about the role of Executive Assistant in a remote-first business? Describe any experience you have working across many time zones. Describe improvements you have made to a process in previous roles. How do you remain calm in a high-stress, fast-paced environment? What has been the highlight of your career so far, and why? Education We consider academic results in high school and university for all roles, regardless of seniority or department. To enjoy a long and varied career at Canonical, one would need to tackle problems that cannot be defined today! From engineering to marketing to operations and sales, we intensely value colleagues who are able to puzzle through difficult problems and find the optimal path forward. How did you rank in your high school, in your final year in maths and hard sciences? Which was your strongest? How did you rank in your high school, in your final year in languages and the arts? Which was your strongest? Please state your high school graduation results or university entrance results, along with the system used, and how to understand those. For example, in the US, you might give your SAT or ACT scores. In Germany, you might give your scores 1-5. What sort of high school student were you? Outside of class, what were your interests and hobbies? What would your high school peers remember you for, if we asked them? Which university and degree did you choose? What other universities did you consider, and why did you select that one? At university, did you do particularly well in an area of your degree? Overall, what was your degree result and how did that reflect on your ability? In high school and university, what did you achieve that was exceptional? What leadership roles did you take on during your education?
      Rispondi alla domanda
      1

      Altre recensioni di colloqui per Executive Assistant presso Canonical

      Colloquio per Executive Assistant

      14 giu 2025
      Candidato anonimo a colloquio
      Vancouver, BC
      Nessuna offerta
      Esperienza neutra
      Colloquio nella media

      Candidatura

      Ho presentato la mia candidatura online. La procedura ha richiesto 5 settimane. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Canonical (Vancouver, BC) nel mese di giu 2025

      Colloquio

      step 3, first part: 3 interviews with peers, each lasting 1 hour. they asked me different questions during each interview. Questions: What is my experience with handling expense reports? What is needed to organize a great event? Did I have an uncomfortable situation with a colleague, and how did I solve it?

      Domande di colloquio [1]

      Domanda 1

      to describe my working day
      Rispondi alla domanda

      Colloquio per Executive Assistant

      24 ago 2025
      Candidato anonimo a colloquio
      Londra, Inghilterra
      Nessuna offerta
      Esperienza negativa
      Colloquio nella media

      Candidatura

      Ho presentato la mia candidatura online. La procedura ha richiesto 5 mesi. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Canonical (Londra, Inghilterra) nel mese di mag 2025

      Colloquio

      Extremely long and drawn out process - 5 months of periodic 1 hour interviews, 2 assessments and a lengthly essay-esque Q&A request after the initial application. They never confirm what salary range you're looking at either, which makes one wonder if the time is even worth it. And they have certain "health requirements" that are wildly out of date given no countries require them for entry anymore. The worst part - if you get to the end of the process and they decide you aren't what they want, they point blank say that they will not give ANY feedback as to why. While I could understand that for a first or second interview, after getting so close to the finish line, a candidate deserves a little personal touch - at least more than a form email!

      Domande di colloquio [1]

      Domanda 1

      Standard questions - nothing out of the ordinary.
      Rispondi alla domanda

      Colloquio per Executive Assistant

      22 mag 2025
      Candidato anonimo a colloquio
      Nessuna offerta
      Esperienza negativa
      Colloquio nella media

      Candidatura

      Ho presentato la mia candidatura online. La procedura ha richiesto 3 giorni. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Canonical nel mese di mag 2025

      Colloquio

      I received an email after submitting my application asking me to complete a written interview, and then I would have 4 1-hour interviews, followed by additional interviews (amount and duration not listed). The written interviewed asked me about my high school experience and college entrance exams scores. All of this and they don't have the pay range available. I dropped out of the process immediately due to their atrocious process. They are definitely leaving good talent on the table with this approach.

      Domande di colloquio [1]

      Domanda 1

      Please state your high school graduation results or university entrance results and explain the grading system used. For example, in the US, you might give your SAT or ACT scores. In Germany, you might give your scores out of a grading system of 1-5, with 1 being the best.
      Rispondi alla domanda