Ho presentato la mia candidatura di persona. La procedura ha richiesto 4 settimane. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Capgemini Engineering (Chennai) nel mese di giu 2017
Colloquio
Aricent scheduled my interview on phone, It was first round and 1 hour, after that the called for second round and it also took around 45 mints and i was selected then the called for managerial round on same day but manager behave was not good, they treat like we don't know and she knows every things very poor mentality but i was confident again selected. Again they send me for client interview in Erricson perungundi and their also i selected. Next day HR told me you are selected and now i am preparing our offer letter, I waited two days then after i called HR for what about my offer letter still i have not received offer but she gave some excuse she gave, I called so many time but always she gave excuse, It's very bad experience in Aricent,Guys be care the HR for Aricent.
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
Basic and intermediate core java questions and basic of spring and hibernate framework
Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Capgemini Engineering
Colloquio
3 interviews, 2 technical and 1 hr. Medium leetcode. Hr was good to know about the team and company culture. Did not upfront discuss comp for the role. Project detail was not discussed but team detail was good
Ho presentato la mia candidatura tramite un'agenzia di reclutamento personale. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Capgemini Engineering (Madrid)
Colloquio
La primera fase consistía en una entrevista con Recursos Humanos para ver trabajos previos, expectativas laborales, etc. Una parte en inglés.
La segunda fase fue mas técnica con el jefe de equipo, con bastantes preguntas técnicas y específicas del lenguaje de programación a usar.
Ho presentato la mia candidatura tramite l'università. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Capgemini Engineering
Colloquio
The interview was straightforward and easy to navigate. It focused mainly on basic programming concepts and aptitude questions. The interviewer carefully evaluated both syntax accuracy and logical thinking. Overall, it was a fundamental-level assessment designed to test core programming knowledge and problem-solving skills.
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
A basic Python question on the Fibonacci series (1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, ...) was also asked.
