Passa al contenutoPassa al piè di pagina
  • Lavori
  • Aziende
  • Stipendi
  • Per le aziende

      Migliora la tua carriera

      Scopri le tue potenzialità di guadagno, trova lavori da sogno e condividi approfondimenti su lavoro e vita privata in forma anonima.

      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Clipboard

      Azienda coinvolta

      Chi siamo
      Recensioni
      Stipendi e benefit
      Lavori
      Colloqui
      Colloqui
      Ricerche correlate: Recensioni su Clipboard | Offerte di lavoro di Clipboard | Stipendi di Clipboard | Benefit di Clipboard
      Colloqui di ClipboardColloqui per Engineering Manager presso ClipboardColloquio di Clipboard


      Glassdoor

      • Chi siamo
      • Contattaci

      Aziende

      • Account Business gratuito
      • Spazio per le aziende
      • Blog per le aziende

      Informazioni

      • Aiuto
      • Linee guida
      • Condizioni d'uso
      • Privacy e scelte pubblicitarie
      • Non vendere né condividere le mie informazioni
      • Strumento per l'accettazione dei cookie

      Lavora con noi

      • Inserzionisti
      • Carriere
      Scarica l'app

      • Cerca:
      • Aziende
      • Lavori
      • Località

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Glassdoor LLC. "Glassdoor," "Worklife Pro," "Bowls" e il relativo logo sono marchi registrati di Glassdoor LLC.

      Aziende seguite

      Non lasciarti sfuggire opportunità e informazioni privilegiate seguendo le aziende dove vorresti lavorare.

      Ricerche di lavoro

      Ricevi suggerimenti e aggiornamenti personalizzati avviando le tue ricerche.

      Colloquio per Engineering Manager

      21 ott 2024
      Candidato anonimo a colloquio
      Toronto, ON
      Nessuna offerta
      Esperienza negativa
      Colloquio nella media

      Candidatura

      Ho presentato la mia candidatura tramite un selezionatore. La procedura ha richiesto 5 giorni. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Clipboard (Toronto, ON) nel mese di ott 2024

      Colloquio

      Welp, here is another negative review. As mentioned in other reviews, they push you to have a PR review assignment without any calls before that. Considering the reviews on Glassdoor, I insisted on having a call with the recruiter first and asking directly about them. The recruiter was nice and convinced me that the company was legit, so I decided to give it a try. I was presented with a PR review assignment. I've carefully read the company's docs and performed the review. In total, I've spent about an hour and a half on it. I felt that I've done a great job. I've blocked the PR as it doesn't match the functional requirements. I've also blocked it because it unexpectedly broke the API. Plus, I've left a comment, telling the worker to fix the REST API design, as they have used the wrong REST method for a new endpoint. I did not block the PR with minor things, so it wasn't a case for perfectionism. On the next working day, I received an answer that I hadn't passed, because `in 2 key areas we did not find that the feedback was strongly aligned with the high bar the team has set: 1. Breaking API change; 2. Issues with the REST API design.` I’m puzzled as to why these reasons are listed. In the review, I blocked the pull request because of a breaking API change and stated it clearly. What is a higher bar than blocking the pull request? Also, I’ve noticed and commented in the PR about the issue with the rest API design and requested a change about it. The reasons for the decline don’t make sense to me, as I don’t understand what should’ve been done differently. This means that my outcome is exactly the same as in other reviews. Considering other reviews, I conclude that this company is either: a) conducting fake interviews so that it can have a metric for "we've done X interviews last quarter". Maybe they do it for government rules, maybe to show that they try hiring someone on the market, before hiring someone they know. Option b) is that the company's hiring process is completely broken and they don't fix it. Either way, my recommendation is to decline to accept an interview from this company. I would never apply anymore to a company with such overwhelmingly poor reviews on Glassdoor.

      Domande di colloquio [1]

      Domanda 1

      Review the pull request provided
      Rispondi alla domanda
      3

      Altre recensioni di colloqui per Engineering Manager presso Clipboard

      Colloquio per Engineering Manager

      25 giu 2026
      Candidato anonimo a colloquio
      San Francisco, CA
      Nessuna offerta
      Esperienza negativa
      Colloquio facile

      Candidatura

      Ho presentato la mia candidatura online. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Clipboard (San Francisco, CA) nel mese di giu 2026

      Colloquio

      Negative experience primarily due to the hiring process. Candidates are required to invest significant time completing an exercise before any initial conversation, yet the level of review effort did not appear proportional. This created a sense of imbalance in time investment. The process began directly with a take-home assignment (a TDD review in this case), without an introductory or alignment discussion. After submission, a follow-up interview was scheduled. A few observations that may help future candidates: First, it became evident during the interview that the written submission had not been fully reviewed. This undermines the purpose of a detailed exercise and suggests that candidates should expect to present their work live regardless of the effort put into the written review. Second, expectations for the assignment were not clearly aligned. Candidates may approach the task from an engineering management perspective—focusing on evaluating reasoning, providing structured feedback, and suggesting improvements without prescribing a single solution. However, the interview emphasized arriving at a specific solution, shifting the discussion away from review quality and toward real-time problem solving. The rejection feedback was generic but quick, with no clear indication of which areas did not meet expectations. During the interview, there were signs of misalignment in expectations and approach, which made the outcome less surprising. As the discussion progressed, the conversation became increasingly focused on a specific solution path, highlighting a lack of alignment on how the exercise was being evaluated. This resulted in reduced engagement toward the later part of the discussion, as it no longer reflected the initially understood scope of the role. Overall, candidates may benefit from: - Clarifying how the assignment will be evaluated (solution-focused vs. review-focused). - Preparing to present a concrete solution, even if the prompt appears open-ended.

      Domande di colloquio [2]

      Domanda 1

      Can you walk me through how you approached this TDD overall (or the exercise )?
      Rispondi alla domanda

      Domanda 2

      You identified the main issues X and Z in the proposed TDD—what alternative solution would you suggest, and can you walk me through it in detail?
      Rispondi alla domanda

      Colloquio per Engineering Manager

      28 mag 2026
      Candidato anonimo a colloquio
      Nessuna offerta
      Esperienza negativa
      Colloquio facile

      Candidatura

      Ho presentato la mia candidatura online. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Clipboard nel mese di mag 2026

      Colloquio

      I participated in an interview process for an Engineering Manager role. They immediately sent a fairly extensive take-home 17-page document with an architectural and management assessment, mimicking an engineering manager reviewing a design produced by a team member. The exercise required producing a detailed analysis and recommendations in a shared Google Docs document. I invested significant personal time into the assignment and produced several pages of original content without using AI-generated assistance. After submission, I received a generic rejection message without personalized feedback regarding the assessment or areas where my profile did not align with the role. Given the seniority and technical depth expected for the position, I was hoping for at least minimal feedback after the amount of work requested during the process. From my perspective, the expectations for the role were set extremely high for outstanding candidates, especially because my background exceeded all listed requirements, including long-term engineering leadership and solutions architecture experience. The experience left me with the impression that the evaluation process may rely heavily on standardized filtering rather than detailed candidate assessment. Candidates considering this process should be prepared for a time-intensive assignment phase without guarantees of feedback after submitting answers.

      Domande di colloquio [1]

      Domanda 1

      As a manager your goal is to (a) evaluate that the TDD is technically sound, the design decisions are valid for the stated problem and if this document is sufficient for development on the feature and (b) provide written feedback to the author that would help them improve not just this document, but their approach to future technical designs. Your feedback should demonstrate how you'd coach an engineer to think more clearly about these problems, and to help them understand how to do better next time. Please prepare written feedback for the author of the TDD summarizing your view of the work at the bottom of this document. Feel also add inline comments to this document as you see fit. You will be evaluated on the quality as well as the content of your feedback.
      1 risposta

      Colloquio per Engineering Manager

      25 mag 2026
      Candidato anonimo a colloquio
      Nessuna offerta
      Esperienza negativa
      Colloquio difficile

      Candidatura

      Ho presentato la mia candidatura online. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Clipboard nel mese di mag 2026

      Colloquio

      I sent in an application for the role already knowing that their interview process started with an async exercise. What I was not expecting was to immediately be sent a *seventeen page* technical design document and be expected to fully parse, review, critique, and provide feedback on it. That is a bananapants expectation from them, there is no way I'm investing that much time and energy on something without having had a single word of human conversation first. I have no idea if I'd be a cultural fit, I have no idea what the salary and benefits are, zero indication of what the role actually entails, and you want me to spend hours on unpaid labor? Forget that noise. If they want to wholly outsource initial filtering to candidates, in a way that is expensive, but not for them, they're more than welcome to do so, just not with me.

      Domande di colloquio [1]

      Domanda 1

      As a manager your goal is to (a) evaluate that the TDD is technically sound, the design decisions are valid for the stated problem and if this document is sufficient for development on the feature and (b) provide written feedback to the author that would help them improve not just this document, but their approach to future technical designs. Your feedback should demonstrate how you'd coach an engineer to think more clearly about these problems, and to help them understand how to do better next time. Please prepare written feedback for the author of the TDD summarizing your view of the work at the bottom of this document. Feel also add inline comments to this document as you see fit. You will be evaluated on the quality as well as the content of your feedback. [seventeen page document follows]
      Rispondi alla domanda