I interviewed at Credit Karma in September, and the process continued for about 2 months. The recruiter was mostly unresponsive, but the scheduling team was prompt. The process included Recruiter screen, HM screen with ML basics and some technical question to understand my background, Coding and ML basic screen, one technical onsite with three 45 mins rounds, including ML Ops, ML basic and Case study round. I cleared all the interviews so far and then there was a functional onsite round with two 45 minutes behavioral rounds where there director came in and asked me about a particular case study related to recommendation system. First of all it was supposed to be a behavioral round but she went into doing a case study and I was ok with it and answered her question well and then came in a hiring manager who seemed to be lost and felt absent in the start of the interview. He was not even able to understand my project which I offered to explain more but he rejected the idea. Anyway, except for the final supposedly behavioral rounds all my interviews went well and I did pretty well on technical and some behavioral rounds. I felt the process was so long and seemed like they were not genuinely trying to hire good people. Also, other post about similar experience corroborates the fact that these people are trying to filter out good candidates and I would 100% agree with the earlier feedback.

Hadn't heard of CK beforehand- was approached on LinkedIn. Responsive, and conscious that I was interviewing with others and likely to receive an offer soon, they fast-tracked the interview process to accommodate - took about a week. Overall, it was a positive experience even though we both decided it wasn't a fit for various reasons. They gave me very thorough feedback from the interview as well. In my experience, how a company treats you in the interview process is how it will treat you while there.