Passa al contenutoPassa al piè di pagina
  • Lavori
  • Aziende
  • Stipendi
  • Per le aziende

      Migliora la tua carriera

      Scopri le tue potenzialità di guadagno, trova lavori da sogno e condividi approfondimenti su lavoro e vita privata in forma anonima.

      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Crossover for Work

      Azienda coinvolta

      Circa
      Recensioni
      Stipendi e benefit
      Lavori
      Colloqui
      Colloqui
      Ricerche correlate: Recensioni su Crossover for Work | Offerte di lavoro di Crossover for Work | Stipendi di Crossover for Work | Benefit di Crossover for Work
      Colloqui di Crossover for WorkColloqui per SVP-Technology presso Crossover for WorkColloquio di Crossover for Work


      Glassdoor

      • Chi siamo
      • Contattaci

      Aziende

      • Account Business gratuito
      • Spazio per le aziende
      • Blog per le aziende

      Informazioni

      • Aiuto
      • Linee guida
      • Condizioni d'uso
      • Privacy e scelte pubblicitarie
      • Non vendere né condividere le mie informazioni
      • Strumento per l'accettazione dei cookie

      Lavora con noi

      • Inserzionisti
      • Carriere
      Scarica l'app

      • Cerca:
      • Aziende
      • Lavori
      • Località

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Glassdoor LLC. "Glassdoor," "Worklife Pro," "Bowls" e il relativo logo sono marchi registrati di Glassdoor LLC.

      Aziende seguite

      Non lasciarti sfuggire opportunità e informazioni privilegiate seguendo le aziende dove vorresti lavorare.

      Ricerche di lavoro

      Ricevi suggerimenti e aggiornamenti personalizzati avviando le tue ricerche.

      Colloquio per SVP-Technology

      18 apr 2021
      Dipendente anonimo
      Offerta accettata
      Esperienza negativa

      Altre recensioni di colloqui per SVP-Technology presso Crossover for Work

      Colloquio per SVP-Technology

      19 feb 2023
      Candidato anonimo a colloquio
      Auckland,
      Nessuna offerta
      Colloquio nella media

      Candidatura

      Ho presentato la mia candidatura online. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Crossover for Work nel mese di gen 2021

      Colloquio

      1- ccat: 50 questions in 15 minutes. they seek about 42+ correct. can be practiced, and since the test is run by a 3rd party you can see some of the actual questions elsewhere 2- english: they used to ask you to record yourself, but now there is a different test - you have to repeat sentences that they read out loud to you. some of the sentences are long and use difficult vocabulary. again, practice, and find ways to improve. there is no 2nd chance. again, this is a 3rd party test, so find it. 3- programming test. yet another 3rd party exam. you are given a few problems and need to code. any language. this part is actually fun. 4- "real work": they will give you some description of a real task they faced recently and ask you to do the job. this is where you can learn how your work will look like. it is time consuming and probably highly biased process. 5 - interview: 1 or 2 zoom interviews. 6 - if you get this far, you have to retake ccat and coding exams, this time with someone watching you.

      Domande di colloquio [1]

      Domanda 1

      describing projects you have managed before.
      Rispondi alla domanda
      1
      Esperienza negativa
      Colloquio facile

      Candidatura

      Ho presentato la mia candidatura online. La procedura ha richiesto 5 settimane. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Crossover for Work (Auckland, ) nel mese di gen 2023

      Colloquio

      Crossover has an interesting process where you take some tests, then perform some so-called "real work", then wait to get an interview ... which doesn't happen and the role gets cancelled. A note on the tests; I see lots of people on here complaining the IQ test is hard or silly, and even, shockingly, web sites selling answers to it or whatever. Look, that test is simple pattern matching and I find it relaxing and fun, to be truthful. Just look for the patterns. For instance, one time it's a solid circle, triangle, and ball, then the next line has a hollow triangle, hollow ball ... so the missing one is clearly the hollow circle, and so on. Anyhow, that aside, these tests are kind of fun. The real work section is a farce though. They ask you to put aside several hours to work through things like, e.g., what are the budget abnormalities for an acquired entity. Or where are the bottlenecks in the first call resolution on the help desk. Or, other things. Once they had me watch this video with two atrocious communicators who laboured over how the help desk works. They were so bad I thought they can't be actors and wondered if they were real staff. When I Google'd their names they were actual real high up execs of the company - yet on the video they were hardly the calibre you expect of an executive. They were poor speakers, all kinds of things. Nevertheless, you submit these "real world" tasks and sometimes they get rejected in seconds to minutes. As if somebody has really read it! It's offensive to ask you to spend so much time on something that is free-text and then ignored because ... what? You didn't use a specific keyword? Who knows. And, other times they get approved. Then you wait for someone to review your application ... wait and wait. The Crossover site says the next step after review is an interview. They say if you haven't heard from then in two weeks to ask. You wait ... and then two weeks later submit an enquiry. Oh, nobody gets back to you. Instead they cancel the role !!! I searched and found online that what happens is they don't actually have all these vast quantity of jobs they spam on LinkedIn. No, instead they simply have fake ads to get a pool of talent - and when you get to the "review" part is when they try to put you in some bid process and see if they can pitch you to employees. Crossover says this is the future of work. Yet, it's not. They don't have customers wanting people who have gone through this process. Instead, it's only their own companies like Topogi or Trinity that they are "selling" to. Now, one time the role wasn't cancelled. I did get a 30-minute interview with some guy. 30 minutes for an SVP role. He was late then forgot to turn his webcam on so I was talking to a blank screen for half the time before he realised. Yet, the person he was looking for (his words) was not actually the position description for the role I'd applied for. It was something else. That wouldn't be so bad, except I then had to guess what he was after based on his brief description and a couple of short questions, while being mindful that we only had 30 minutes total and it was hard to go into depth due to the constraint. In the end they didn't offer me this role, and while I'm not surprised, it was really a poor interview experience. They're asking me to prove my value for a role I'd never heard of before with only 30 minutes time total to learn about it and answer some questions? Even though I'd passed all their other tests - oh, except they weren't relevant because the interviewer was after a different kind of person. It's simply that I was in their bid pool - because I applied for a job that was clearly non-existant.

      Domande di colloquio [1]

      Domanda 1

      Are you security-minded? I forget the rest, but they were all basic, but without the opportunity to go into detail because the time was so constrained.
      Rispondi alla domanda
      11