The interview process seemed very streamlined. All of my interviews were scheduled over a two day period which was nice. There were no take-home assessments, and everybody that interviewed me was friendly and candid.

Phase 1: Recruiter Screen This was a pretty standard initial chat. The recruiter was friendly and focused on my background, specifically looking for alignment with the basic requirements of the role. They asked about my experience with project management methodologies (Agile, Waterfall, etc.), the types of projects I've managed (especially anything related to software, data science, or AI/ML), and my general interest in DataRobot. Be prepared to talk about your salary expectations early on. This was more about checking if there was a mutual fit on paper. Phase 2: Hiring Manager Screen This was a deeper dive with the actual hiring manager. It was less about my resume bullet points and more about how I think as a project manager. They asked a lot of behavioral questions, like "Tell me about a time you had to deal with a difficult stakeholder," or "Describe a project that went off track and how you recovered." They were really trying to gauge my problem-solving skills, communication style, and leadership approach. I made sure to use the STAR method (Situation, Task, Action, Result) to structure my answers and provide concrete examples. This conversation also delved into the specifics of the PM role at DataRobot. They explained the team structure, the types of projects I'd be working on, and the challenges I might face. I asked a lot of clarifying questions about their processes and expectations, which I think they appreciated. Phase 3: Panel Interview This was the most intense part, but also the most interesting. I met with a panel of about four people, including the hiring manager, a product manager, an engineer, and maybe someone from the data science team. Each person had their own area of focus. The product manager asked about my experience working with product roadmaps and translating business requirements into technical specifications. The engineer grilled me on my understanding of software development lifecycles and my ability to communicate effectively with technical teams. The data science team member was interested in my experience with data-related projects and my understanding of the AI/ML landscape (even at a high level). This panel wasn't just about answering questions; it was a conversation. They wanted to see how I could think on my feet and collaborate with different personalities and perspectives. They also presented a mini-case study – a hypothetical project scenario – and asked me how I would approach it. This was a chance to demonstrate my project planning skills, risk management strategies, and ability to prioritize.