Ho presentato la mia candidatura online. La procedura ha richiesto 3 settimane. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso FDM Group (New York, NY) nel mese di apr 2019
Colloquio
Phone interview with basic description of how company works, follow by video interview with basic questions like describe yourself and an assignment interview with logic questions. afterward, HR will schedule for on site interviews and such
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
Given a flowchat with input a, b, c, d ....etc, what would be the output from the flow chat
The entire process was pretty simple. Initially you will get an arctic shores assessment which tests your analytical and problem-solving skills. Post that, you will be scheduled for an initial screening call for 20 mins with your recruiter. You will be given a hackerrank test which includes coding+sql based on the role. If you have cleared the round,, you will be invited for a final interview with the account manager
Ho presentato la mia candidatura di persona. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso FDM Group (Toronto, ON) nel mese di giu 2026
Colloquio
I honestly feel like the first Java coding question in this OA is designed in a very frustrating way.
The issue is not just that the question is hard. The real problem is that the provided starter code seems to contain some very hidden trap that makes the solution fail to compile, and the platform gives almost no useful compiler feedback. You only have around 20 minutes, but you are expected to not only write the actual logic, but also somehow identify the intentionally confusing issue inside the provided code without a proper IDE or clear error message.
That makes the question feel less like a Java coding assessment and more like a blind debugging challenge. Unless you are very strong at debugging Java syntax and environment issues under pressure, it is extremely easy to get stuck forever even if your actual idea is correct.
I understand that companies want to test attention to detail, but hiding a subtle compile issue in the source code and giving no clear feedback feels unnecessarily punishing. In a real development environment, nobody debugs this way. You would normally have IDE hints, compiler logs, stack traces, or at least enough information to locate the problem.
For an entry-level or graduate-style OA, this feels especially rough because the assessment is supposed to test basic coding ability, not whether you can reverse-engineer a hidden trap in a broken template within 20 minutes.
Ho presentato la mia candidatura online. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso FDM Group nel mese di giu 2026
Colloquio
You have an initial call with recruiter about background, schooling and experience, Then technical assessment on coding platform to test programming and Java knowledge. Then behavioral interview with questions about soft skills.
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
In the behavioral, they asked me to describe background and history.