Ho presentato la mia candidatura tramite segnalazione di un dipendente. La procedura ha richiesto un giorno. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso FactSet (Hyderabad) nel mese di mag 2010
Colloquio
The whole process was good.
Written test for testing Communication as well as tech skills followed by Interviews
Ho presentato la mia candidatura online. La procedura ha richiesto 3 settimane. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso FactSet (Londra, Inghilterra) nel mese di nov 2025
Colloquio
I had a one-hour introductory call, followed by two technical interviews. Initially HR told me there would be only one technical interview, but they added a second one. After the second technical interview they stopped progressing my application, and I have one sencente feedback . What’s confusing is that during the interview everything was completed, they confirmed all tasks were covered, and the interview even finished a few minutes early. I asked several times if there was anything else they wanted to evaluate, and they said no. So I genuinely don’t understand the reason for the rejection.
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
30 min python coding , 30 mins sql, 30 mins design
There were total three rounds and then HR round, third round was supposed to be managerial round, I cleared both two technical rounds and after that they put the process on hold and hired other candidate. when I asked him the reason he simply said they need more experience person
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
In first round he asked me two coding questions which are on data structure
Very misdirecting. No real conversation, every solution I proposed was problematic. I looked in the stl documentation of std:::list and my up my proposed solution in would have worked. i guess I was supposed to be confrontational and opened up the document in in std::list. Hacker rank kept completing the wrong code.
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
Implement something, with no written requirements. And every solution was problematic