Passa al contenutoPassa al piè di pagina
  • Lavori
  • Aziende
  • Stipendi
  • Per le aziende

      Migliora la tua carriera

      Scopri le tue potenzialità di guadagno, trova lavori da sogno e condividi approfondimenti su lavoro e vita privata in forma anonima.

      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Form3

      Azienda coinvolta

      Circa
      Recensioni
      Stipendi e benefit
      Lavori
      Colloqui
      Colloqui
      Ricerche correlate: Recensioni su Form3 | Offerte di lavoro di Form3 | Stipendi di Form3 | Benefit di Form3
      Colloqui di Form3Colloqui per Senior Software Engineer presso Form3Colloquio di Form3


      Glassdoor

      • Chi siamo
      • Contattaci

      Aziende

      • Account Business gratuito
      • Spazio per le aziende
      • Blog per le aziende

      Informazioni

      • Aiuto
      • Linee guida
      • Condizioni d'uso
      • Privacy e scelte pubblicitarie
      • Non vendere né condividere le mie informazioni
      • Strumento per l'accettazione dei cookie

      Lavora con noi

      • Inserzionisti
      • Carriere
      Scarica l'app

      • Cerca:
      • Aziende
      • Lavori
      • Località

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Glassdoor LLC. "Glassdoor," "Worklife Pro," "Bowls" e il relativo logo sono marchi registrati di Glassdoor LLC.

      Aziende seguite

      Non lasciarti sfuggire opportunità e informazioni privilegiate seguendo le aziende dove vorresti lavorare.

      Ricerche di lavoro

      Ricevi suggerimenti e aggiornamenti personalizzati avviando le tue ricerche.

      Colloquio per Senior Software Engineer

      12 mar 2020
      Candidato anonimo a colloquio
      Gothenburg
      Nessuna offerta
      Esperienza positiva
      Colloquio nella media

      Candidatura

      Ho presentato la mia candidatura tramite un selezionatore. La procedura ha richiesto 2 mesi. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Form3 (Gothenburg) nel mese di mar 2020

      Colloquio

      tl;dr: Challenging, educative, and fun Step 1 - Initial Interview: Had initial phone interview with one of the company's recruiters. Topic was my background mostly as well as the position itself. Interview was pleasant, brief (30mins) and on-topic. Had the opportunity to answer a lot of my questions through it. Step 2 - Coding Test: Was given a coding test without a time limit. Estimate was 4-8 hours; took me ~20 hours. Topic was to create a REST API client in Go. Overall level was average. Coding-wise I'd consider it an easy case. What I liked the most was the many different aspects you'd need to take into consideration; from infrastructure to documentation to implementation etc. Depending on experience and the assumptions I had to consider, the implementation time could have been ~10 hours. There were some things left up for interpretation on the assignment, but I found this part to actually be the challenging one and I enjoyed it a lot. Step 3 - Final Interview: Duration was 1.5 hours. Interview was split into 3 one-on-one 30min sessions, with 3 of the company's senior software engineers, respectively. First part - Info about form3 tech and brief code assessment of my test: We had an interesting discussion around my code, going through decisions I had made while implementing it. All comments were valid, I agreed with almost all of them, and got the chance to explain why I did what I did. Second part - Knowledge check: Basically many questions around specific topics of interest, where I was asked to expand on in some form of Q&A style. I hadn't expected the topics, but the interviewer was very collaborative and willing to have some sort of discussion going on around those. Final part - Debugging case and Q&A: Went through an interactive debugging case, which I enjoyed A LOT! I had expected something completely different and that was definitely a pleasant surprise for me. Was challenging and fun at the same time. Afterwards there was time to discuss around some questions of general interest that I had and the interviewer was willing to prolong the session a bit, in order to answer to all my questions. Overall: I got a very nice vibes from all 3 members of the team and I could definitely imagine pair programming and in general collaborating with any of them. Each one had a different personality and seemed to have different experience level and area of expertise. It was a balanced mix of people and content and I really enjoyed it. Finally, the recruiter herself was very friendly, helpful, and easy to talk with throughout all steps of the process.

      Domande di colloquio [1]

      Domanda 1

      Questions focused on: - Brief code review of my coding assessment - Brief knowledge check on related areas - Interactive debugging case
      Rispondi alla domanda
      5

      Altre recensioni di colloqui per Senior Software Engineer presso Form3

      Colloquio per Senior Software Engineer

      14 mar 2023
      Candidato anonimo a colloquio
      Nessuna offerta
      Esperienza negativa
      Colloquio facile

      Candidatura

      Ho presentato la mia candidatura online. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Form3 nel mese di feb 2023

      Colloquio

      Homework assignment: They will ask you to create a library for their payment API. This task is pretty straightforward. However, it's a lot. From this assignment, you can tell that they don't assess your technical skill and ask you to invest tons of time in the beginning, then their reviewer will just say, "missing integration test," and then reject you. After the home assignment, they'll discuss this for the next round. Just like other reviews. It's not worth your time. They're not interested to see your quality. I abandon the test since I'm pretty sure with this kind of test, anyone can pass with just extra effort.

      Domande di colloquio [1]

      Domanda 1

      check their github. it's publicly accessible
      Rispondi alla domanda
      6

      Colloquio per Senior Software Engineer

      24 ott 2022
      Candidato anonimo a colloquio
      Nessuna offerta
      Esperienza neutra
      Colloquio facile

      Candidatura

      Ho presentato la mia candidatura tramite un selezionatore. La procedura ha richiesto 2 settimane. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Form3

      Colloquio

      Would not reccomend. Very streamlined process. I was approached by the HR via LinkedIn; they were extremely polite and described the position and the entire process from start to finish. It begins with a take-home exercise, a review and (if you passed the review) three quick technical interviews. There is no problem if you do not know their commonly used language, Golang. Apparently, they care for the talent and not the familiarity in the language which is an amazing "thumbs up" for company culture or at least that is the impressions you get in the begging. I submitted my exercise, and they replied in exactly 5 days. When it came to my review, my code was well written, documented and well tested and the feedback was positive about it. But the assignment was rejected without a further discussion for the below reasons: - Not liking the way data are passed into functions (in context you are asked to learn the language and get the job done) so using method A or method Z should not matter. - No retries policy implemented. This is a dealbreaker. Arguably, they create a myriad of services doing payment processes, of course they would want a standalone policy for each process, but they should give more context on what they expect. Retries policy are commonly handled manually. - Not enough assertions in the Create Response. Assert every single variable. That is a quite ridiculous statement to reject an assignment to. My final verdict, quite unfair handling. It is quite possible that they have passed lesser assignments just for the retry policy as it is quite important internally for the company but that does not judge a good software engineer. They should be more objective with their approach. In the code assignment they should judge code and ability to cover the assignment. Just for context, you are asked to learn a new language, create a package for that language, read their API documentation, make integration tests and finally have it containerized and tested against a fake version of their API in a provided docker-compose. So, outright rejecting an application from the coding assignment with mixed feedback is quite questionable. Knowledge should be judged in the technical interviews. Honestly, would not recommend. The impression from the engineers was like being "human-robots" - missing the forest for the tree. This is quite a red flag.

      Domande di colloquio [1]

      Domanda 1

      You are being asked to create an HTTP client package which should be capable to be used out of the box in a production enviroment. The process is mainly judged on the tests.
      Rispondi alla domanda
      11

      Colloquio per Senior Software Engineer

      30 nov 2022
      Dipendente anonimo
      Londra, Inghilterra
      Offerta accettata
      Esperienza positiva
      Colloquio difficile

      Candidatura

      Ho presentato la mia candidatura tramite segnalazione di un dipendente. La procedura ha richiesto 2 settimane. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Form3 (Londra, Inghilterra) nel mese di nov 2022

      Colloquio

      I was referred by an ex-colleague who already worked at Form3. After referring the recruiter sent me an e-mail for an initial call. It was a nice and easy going conversation and got really excited by the fact that she was confirming what I already knew about their values, how they work, what life of a senior engineer looks like at Form3 etc. After the first call I've got a take home exercise to implement an API Client (in Go) for their Fake Account API. This is where you can show your quality (even though the exercise itself is not that challenging), you can show that you understand best practices, how to test your software and how to make it readable and understandable etc. After finishing your take home exercise an Engineering team of Form3 is gonna review the code and this code will, after a short introduction on Form3, be part of the discussion in Part 1/3 of the next interview steps, where you can explain your approach, your tradeoffs etc. But this depends on the review of your code. One other thing I liked about their approach is that they don't mind if you're not experienced with Go (as long as you write that in your README). They will take the lack of experience into account, as they're looking for problem solving ability and engineering standards. Interview part 2/3 is about System Design and how you would change an architecture if certain requirements would change (how would you plan for fault tolerance, resiliency, high availability, consistency etc.) to see if you understand the fundamentals of distributed systems. The final part is a debugging exercise where you're simulating an on-call rotation. You'll get scenario based questions based on an microservice architecture diagram and get to ask the interview all the questions you like (what's in the logs, what metrics are available, other characteristics that may lead to finding the simulated issue in the scenario. Before the aforementioned interview takes place, the recruiter will reach out to you to make sure you're well prepared and know what to expect. For some companies every candidate is just a number on the list and for some companies you're a person they care about and they want to give an equal opportunity. The latter is the case with Form3. This is something I really liked and many other companies could take this as a good example to learn from.

      Domande di colloquio [1]

      Domanda 1

      - Form3 introduction & discussing Takehome exercise (review) - System Design exercise - Debugging exercise (on-call simulation) based with scenario based questions based on an microservice architecture diagram
      Rispondi alla domanda
      2

      Le migliori aziende per "stipendio e benefit" vicino a te

      avatar
      Mastercard
      4.0★Stipendio e benefit