Domande di colloquio presso Geronimo Power

The overall process was well-structured at a high level: an initial recruiter screen, a department lead interview, and a panel round. The first two stages were professional and gave me a solid sense of the role and company. My main feedback is on the panel interview itself. It was formatted as three back-to-back 30-minute 1:1s rather than a single cohesive 90-minute conversation. All three ran over time, and there were some execution issues — one interviewer lost their prepared questions when their laptop died, and another was visibly distracted throughout. These things happen, but together they made the experience feel a bit disjointed. The third conversation was the most substantive and ended on an honest note I appreciated: the interviewer acknowledged that the operations department — which this role would support closely — can be difficult to work with at times. That kind of transparency is genuinely useful for candidates, even if it raises questions worth thinking through. No offer was extended - I believe due to my salary expectations vs the posted range. Would I recommend interviewing here? It depends on the role. The company seems solid, and the people I spoke with were kind and knowledgeable. Just go in knowing the panel format may not be the most efficient use of your time.

HR interview. The recruiter was friendly, but seemed disorganized and unprofessional. She wore a hoodie to the interview and chewed gum throughout, including pushing the gum out of her mouth so I could see it. It was gross and distracting. The interview itself was ok, but I would’ve appreciated more structure. On a positive note, the recruiter shared the benefits package after the interview, which was nice. FYI they have excellent benefits. Regardless, the experience did not leave me with a positive impression of the company. Way too many red flags.