They have a very standardized interview process. Phone call w HR, take-home tech skills assessment, panel interview. I did fine on the initial two phases, and comparing my code to other solutions up on GitHub, it was not hard to advance to the panel round. This is where the experience wasn't so good - the initial interviewer had technical difficulties and was at least 5 minutes late. Throughout that first hour, he mentioned time being short several times, and saved a tech coding question for the last 20 minutes. As I start to define some entity classes, he stops me and says not to, just focus on the algorithm because there isn't enough time. This essentially strips away a frame of reference for myself to use when implementing the algorithm - it wasn't a difficult problem, but the frequent reminders about time running out are not really conducive to do my best problem solving. It was unprofessional and threw me off, so much so that I mentioned it to the next two interviewers in the second hour. If you are trying to assess how a SE tries to solve a problem or implement an algorithm, let them work it out!

The first step was an interview with HR personnel. The next step was a coding assessment. The only feedback that I received was that I scored too low. I asked for detailed feedback, but there was no response to my request. The company is very impressive with great compensation packages. However, the developer assessment is a bit flawed. You can find example code on Github dating years back. I suggest updating the assessment and have different tests for the particular job in question. I had to learn Angular and Entity Framework for the assessment when those technologies were not in the job spec or mentioned in the initial phone call.