Ho presentato la mia candidatura tramite segnalazione di un dipendente. La procedura ha richiesto 8 settimane. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso IXL Learning
Colloquio
Process took ~8 weeks in total. Applied through Jobvite, had reference from a current Product Analyst. Got phone interview, no unexpected questions, similar to those described in other Glassdoor reviews, complete with jelly bean brain teaser. Was given job test, which I spent the full week on. Was called in to on-site interview - 3 hours, 3 different people, all very nice and asked fair questions about my background, teaching experience and how I would generate questions for the problem generators. Pretty exhausting though. Was then called into a second on-site interview to meet the other Science Product Analysts and had another interview with the heads of the team. After a few days, was sent email expressing that I was "not a match". I was utterly baffled by this decision, as I'm well qualified for this position, every interview had gone well, and they had expressed several times that they were "very impressed" by my performance. No clue what they're looking for.
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
Most difficult question was second brain teaser asked at on-site interview.
Ho presentato la mia candidatura tramite l'università. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso IXL Learning (Los Angeles, CA) nel mese di ott 2014
Colloquio
Interviewed during campus recruiting. Interview only lasted 30 minutes and seemed rushed. Recruiters were very friendly and kind but Interviewer was awkward and inexperienced. I wasn't surprised by the question content but thrown off by how uninterested the interviewer appeared.
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
Demonstrate how you would teach a science concept of your choice to a third grader.
Ho presentato la mia candidatura online. La procedura ha richiesto 4 settimane. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso IXL Learning (Foster City, CA) nel mese di giu 2014
Colloquio
I applied to the Product Analyst position online without knowing anyone at the company and got notification that I'd be having a phone interview within about a week of my application.
The phone interview had all the standard questions (Why IXL?, etc) in addition to a brain teaser. I was also asked to describe my PhD research as I would to a kid in 4th Grade. I was notified at the end of the phone call that I'd be advancing to the next round, the skills test.
They emailed me the skills test with a few questions for me to answer at home over the space of a week. The questions were, apparently, a fairly good representation of the type of work you'd be doing for the company in this position. I did my best but was a little unsure about how I'd done, but it must have been good enough because within a few days I was notified that I would be advancing to the on-site interview round.
The onsite interview lasted about 2 hours. I met with 3 different people; a math product analyst, a science product analyst and a director. You are just left in one room the whole time while the interviewers come to you, but they give you some puzzles and reading material about the company to keep you entertained while you're waiting. The two product analysts were very heavy on skills questions, very similar to the take-home skills test but you are expected to answer on the spot. You're given an example of a problem that might appear on the website then asked how you would vary difficulty on this problem, what other types of questions you might ask and how you'd make it more engaging. The director asked more typical interview questions about past conflicts/resolutions at work, why I want to work at that company, what experience makes me the ideal candidate, etc.
In the end, I was left feeling unsure how I'd done but didn't feel like I'd said anything too stupid. I didn't get an offer so I don't have any useful advice about what they may be looking for.
