Met with great smart people and yawning managers. I had more than 6 rounds of interviews, I enjoyed most of them. I also noticed bored managers who yawn a lot during the interview. I worked quite good numbers of years and I can understand such team members. It ook me more than seven hours, but sadly I didn't get a feedback. I learned two things about indeed. One, it has good WLB, and second, not as humany global as the company is. It is all on papers and flyers. Indeed should have done what candidates deserve the least, feedback. For some of us, cracking challenging problems and meeting the job descriptions is not enough.

Application I interviewed at Indeed Interview 1. Phone screening with a recruiter 2. Karat problem solving 3. White boarding exercise 4. Automation exercise 5. Mentor exercise 6. Code review 7. Hiring manager round The interviewers were very helpful. Problems were doable with little practice. The automation exercise was fair. No out-of-the-blue questions. The recruiter was kind. Looks like they are not seriously interested to hire candidates but interested to do interviews. They are looking for geeks may be from Stanford or MIT for these positions ha ha ha It looks like I did good to average in the coding round, mentorship round, framework, and code review round. I still don't know why I got rejected. Even if you see the reviews for tech positions, no one got an offer. I can bet, that if anyone gets an offer, they might already get 100k+ what Indeed offers outside. for sure they won't join in indeed I was exhausted by their full loop. I never see an interview for 1.5 hrs for framework. do u really think u want to write framework in 1.5 hrs If you really want to hire people, set some realistic expectations rather than wasting our time

1. HR Recruiting Call. Asked about my current position what I have accomplished in current role 2. Karat interview. Coding interview with the browser IDE using questions similar to Leetcode or Hacker Rank.