Ho presentato la mia candidatura online. La procedura ha richiesto 5 giorni. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Indicative (New York, NY) nel mese di gen 2016
Colloquio
I applied to Indicative as an out of state candidate. I was contacted for a phone screening almost right away. The gentleman who conducted the phone screening was very easy going, and he asked me standard phone screening questions. The next day I was assigned a mini software project. Once submitted, we did a code review over Skype. The process was very rapid. Everyone was very kind and professional during the entire process.
Ho presentato la mia candidatura tramite un selezionatore. La procedura ha richiesto 4 settimane. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Indicative (New York, NY) nel mese di feb 2016
Colloquio
Standard phone screening, followed by 2 in-person interviews. The first interview was a lengthy discussion about a previous project of mine and a review of the code base. The second interview involved some fun problem solving on the white board with two other engineers and talking through potential scenarios with a product manager. Both went well. Well enough that I was then tasked to complete an assignment as part of the next round. This was not very time-consuming, but did involve building an app from scratch. I received nothing but good feedback about all aspects of the app and was asked how I would improve specific things, I responded immediately with answers and even made the improvements to the app. I was a little disappointed at the lack of back-and-forth. After the time I had put in, some sort of code review would have been nice. After about a week of hearing nothing, I received a very short rejection email with absolutely no explanation. It was all very misleading and if I had known beforehand how little courtesy the employer had, I would not have given them the time. It's a shame because the product is great.
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
Create a function that returned the Fibonacci number of a given value