Ho presentato la mia candidatura tramite un'agenzia di reclutamento personale. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Intercontinental Exchange (New York, NY) nel mese di lug 2014
Colloquio
Was contacted by agent and send my resume over. First got phone screen interview, then they called for a Java Test 3-4 pages test (75 min) . They are not valuing your experience just test skills. All questions are expected to finished in 2-3 mins otherwise not enough to cover the test, but you happenly saw it before, you can get it right. That is the worst experienc I had, I am not used to code on the writing paper.
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
Design question, JMS model and method name. Algorithim question for finding a bug of Linkedlist loop. Java Tuning questions out of memory question.
Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Intercontinental Exchange (Calgary, AB)
Colloquio
First there is telephonic screening for 15 min. After that, there are 3 rounds in the interview process: the first one is a technical mock, the second is technical coding with HackerRank, and the last round is in person.
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
Find duplicate data and delete it from the employee table.
Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Intercontinental Exchange (New York, NY)
Colloquio
Interview process is tough and comprises of multiple rounds. Online written followed by multiple rounds of coding/ tech interview. And after you clear then behavioral round of interview and then you get offer. Still you can negotiate on salary but not a lot
Ho presentato la mia candidatura online. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Intercontinental Exchange
Colloquio
I had read the bad reviews but had to experience myself to truly believe it. For the in-person java test, they asked question about inserting a node in a BST. Here is the problem, I provided a working iterative solution but the person knew only recursive and to my horror he said the only way it would work is through recursive. The irony is, I have been working with complex BST traversal at work recently so this question was luckily trivial but was dumb-founded to not even able to explain or demonstrate the solution. There were other questions and they were all standard ones but subjective.