I interviewed for a SWE 2 role. All virtual and was expected to answer two questions. a leetcode medium questions along with a design question. The interview lasted for a few hours and I got a chance to talk about my work and why I want to work here.
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
First question was about LRU Cache. The second question was more design-related
Ho presentato la mia candidatura online. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Intuit
Colloquio
Uptime crew interview process
Online assessment - 4 questions
recruiter screen - 30 min
build challenge - 4/5hrs take home and upload on github
Tech screen - questions on build challenge and conceptual. Also asked tradeoffs
Domande di colloquio [2]
Domanda 1
How do you use AI assistants in software development
Started off with a coding challenge. Then a 1 on 1 where you are supposed to show the interviewer a personal project. The interview was pretty easy, but the questions were almost all AI related.
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
When have you leveraged AI in your work, either personal or professional
I had an initial exploratory screen with a technical recruiter who reached out to me. When I transparently stated my boundaries regarding senior IC leveling to ensure we were aligned, the recruiter became visibly defensive. Instead of navigating the leveling discussion professionally, they expressed frustration, accused me of cutting them off, and suggested I needed to do more homework on the company.
I chose to be transparent to avoid wasting either of our time. It’s disappointing to see a recruiting process that penalizes clear, efficient communication from senior talent, especially when other top-tier tech firms handle these exact boundaries seamlessly.
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
Exploratory call with recruiter to learn about my background.