* I cannot recall the exact title I applied for, but it was a typical QA Job * The interview process was pretty standard. It started with a recruiter phone screen. Nothing notable on the phone screen, seemed mostly like they were confirming you were a normal person and didn't lie on your resume. After that there was a "take home" written exercise that had you answer conceptual questions about how you would test different real world things, i.e. a jacket. The final round was a series of panel interviews. I spoke to some team members, as well as the tea lead / director. They had me do some live debugging of one of their products, so play around with those and make an account before you interview. I ultimately didn't get an offer. I was told I didn't catch all of the testable items they would have liked in the exercise I did with the team lead.

The Interview process felt pretty straight forward. Nothing technical and mostly an attitude check to ensure you fit into the work environment. I feel that this is suitable for many workplaces where they are hiring entry level positions. Having the listed skills is nice to have, but they would rather you be in the right mindset of learning than walk in with the skills thinking you already know how to do things.