Passa al contenutoPassa al piè di pagina
  • Lavori
  • Aziende
  • Stipendi
  • Per le aziende

      Migliora la tua carriera

      Scopri le tue potenzialità di guadagno, trova lavori da sogno e condividi approfondimenti su lavoro e vita privata in forma anonima.

      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Marsh

      Azienda coinvolta

      Circa
      Recensioni
      Stipendi e benefit
      Lavori
      Colloqui
      Colloqui
      Ricerche correlate: Recensioni su Marsh | Offerte di lavoro di Marsh | Stipendi di Marsh | Benefit di Marsh
      Colloqui di MarshColloqui per Graduate Development Programmer presso MarshColloquio di Marsh


      Glassdoor

      • Chi siamo
      • Contattaci

      Aziende

      • Account Business gratuito
      • Spazio per le aziende
      • Blog per le aziende

      Informazioni

      • Aiuto
      • Linee guida
      • Condizioni d'uso
      • Privacy e scelte pubblicitarie
      • Non vendere né condividere le mie informazioni
      • Strumento per l'accettazione dei cookie

      Lavora con noi

      • Inserzionisti
      • Carriere
      Scarica l'app

      • Cerca:
      • Aziende
      • Lavori
      • Località

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Glassdoor LLC. "Glassdoor," "Worklife Pro," "Bowls" e il relativo logo sono marchi registrati di Glassdoor LLC.

      Aziende seguite

      Non lasciarti sfuggire opportunità e informazioni privilegiate seguendo le aziende dove vorresti lavorare.

      Ricerche di lavoro

      Ricevi suggerimenti e aggiornamenti personalizzati avviando le tue ricerche.

      Colloquio per Graduate Development Programmer

      13 mag 2017
      Candidato anonimo a colloquio
      Nessuna offerta
      Esperienza neutra
      Colloquio nella media

      Candidatura

      Ho presentato la mia candidatura online. La procedura ha richiesto 3 mesi. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Marsh nel mese di feb 2016

      Colloquio

      Applied online and received a telephone call from an external graduate recruitment agency. We spoke about my application. Within a week they called again with a surprise short telephone interview. I was then invited to the Assessment Centre. I was told to prepare a short 3 minute presentation as to why I should be hired by Marsh. The assessment centre was around 4 hours long. First, candidates introduced themselves to the recruiters, other candidates, and members of Marsh group. We were asked to give our best achievement in life, and then questioned on why that was such an achievement. Two group assessment activities were completed - one involving assessing and rating the use of a list of items in order to survive a ship wreck, and a second involved conferring between groups to complete a puzzle involving different monetary values. At all times we were examined by both Marsh representatives and members of the recruitment agency. After a short break, we were asked to prepare for the presentations. We were taken into individual rooms to present to three members of the Marsh group. We then had a short final meeting with all candidates where the recruitment agency and Marsh identified when and how we would be contacted should they wish to interview us further. When this was finished we were free to leave. I was contacted just after a week from the interview date. I was told that I was just outside of what they were looking for, but I was asked should another candidate drop out or be unable to attend the next stage that it would be ok to still consider me for another interview. The recruitment agency would contact me either way to let me know if they wanted to interview me further or to indicate that they would be taking their original cohort. I agreed to this. At this point I asked for feedback to improve my interview technique for the future, they declined to give me any immediately rather asking me to wait until after they got back in contact with me. Unfortunately, they didn't ask me to interview further, and when I asked for feedback the person calling me indicated that I needed to speak with another member of staff to get my feedback. I called the recruitment company, and emailed the member of staff directly, but had no response. After around two weeks, the staff member called me and apologised for the lateness of response stating that they were busy sorting out the candidates they had taken on. I felt that was understandable, but refrained commenting that they had three opportunities to get my feedback out of the way prior to that conversation. Feedback was mixed, but generally helpful. The staff member went over areas of the interview that I did well at, and those that I did not so well at. They indicated that Marsh generally liked me, but felt that I wasn't direct enough in some of the group activities. They also indicated that although I had been correct with many of the aspects of one of the activities that because I didn't push the group to do what I wanted it had counted against me. Finally, they made some interesting comments about my appearance: one member of staff felt my hair was 'messy' and that I should have hair cut. I felt this comment was slightly lacking in tact, and also slightly inappropriate. The member of staff I was speaking to made it clear it was not their opinion, and I felt it was unnecessary for me to ask any further on the matter. Feedback from this lasted around 10 minutes. Overall, the bad aspects of the experience countered the good. It taught me what to expect from interview days like this, and also what I don't want in potential employers. I am unsure whether some of these aspects are reflections of what Marsh is like as a company, or what the recruitment agency is like. Either way, I am glad that I had the opportunity to be interviewed, even if it was to just brush up on my technique.

      Domande di colloquio [1]

      Domanda 1

      You are obviously a competitive person, do you feel that makes you hard to work with?
      Rispondi alla domanda