Passa al contenutoPassa al piè di pagina
  • Lavori
  • Aziende
  • Stipendi
  • Per le aziende

      Migliora la tua carriera

      Scopri le tue potenzialità di guadagno, trova lavori da sogno e condividi approfondimenti su lavoro e vita privata in forma anonima.

      employer cover photo

      Mistral AI

      Questa è la tua azienda?

      Circa
      Recensioni
      Stipendi e benefit
      Lavori
      Colloqui
      Colloqui
      Ricerche correlate: Recensioni su Mistral AI | Offerte di lavoro di Mistral AI | Stipendi di Mistral AI | Benefit di Mistral AI
      Colloqui di Mistral AIColloqui per Applied AI Engineer presso Mistral AIColloquio di Mistral AI


      Glassdoor

      • Chi siamo
      • Contattaci

      Aziende

      • Account Business gratuito
      • Spazio per le aziende
      • Blog per le aziende

      Informazioni

      • Aiuto
      • Linee guida
      • Condizioni d'uso
      • Privacy e scelte pubblicitarie
      • Non vendere né condividere le mie informazioni
      • Strumento per l'accettazione dei cookie

      Lavora con noi

      • Inserzionisti
      • Carriere
      Scarica l'app

      • Cerca:
      • Aziende
      • Lavori
      • Località

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Glassdoor LLC. "Glassdoor," "Worklife Pro," "Bowls" e il relativo logo sono marchi registrati di Glassdoor LLC.

      Aziende seguite

      Non lasciarti sfuggire opportunità e informazioni privilegiate seguendo le aziende dove vorresti lavorare.

      Ricerche di lavoro

      Ricevi suggerimenti e aggiornamenti personalizzati avviando le tue ricerche.

      Colloquio per Applied AI Engineer

      15 ott 2025
      Candidato anonimo a colloquio
      Nessuna offerta
      Esperienza negativa
      Colloquio facile

      Candidatura

      Ho presentato la mia candidatura tramite segnalazione di un dipendente. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Mistral AI

      Colloquio

      - I was approached by a Mistral employee on LinkedIn; I was not actively looking for a job at the time, but felt it was worth trying. - First step was a call with this person. - I was then sent various links to resources to best prepare (mostly about LLM evaluation). - Second step was a Python interview, with a focus on refactoring. The interview was not hard for someone with experience in Python, but at times the interviewer did not seem to be too attentive (for example, when I asked if I should use sync or async logic, he asked me in return if I knew what async was; several times he also asked questions and answered them right away without really waiting for my answer). - Third step was a chat about LLM with another Mistral employee; mostly about RAG. The interviewer was nice and open-minded, though at times I could not get them to justify their choices (for example, when discussing RAG vs fine-tuning for a specific use-case, the interviewer was in favor of fine-tuning because "it works better with this use-case," with little further elaboration). - Heard nothing from them for ~10 days, then was invited to the 4th step. Their interview scheduling system is a bit unreliable: most of the time, there are no availabilities, and you have to regularly check the portal in order to hope to book a time. - Fourth step: Python pair programming interview. The interviewer was late and had network issues on their side (not their fault, but worth noting for context). The exercise was about using a third-party API, for information retrieval, in combination with the Mistral API, in order to add the external information/data to the context. The exercise was easy enough to understand, the interviewer made me share my screen to see my IDE. Their network issue made it difficult for them to follow, I could feel they were losing patience at times, and they even had to disconnect from the call a couple of times because of it. In the end, I managed to complete the exercise, even though we could not test the end-to-end result because we did not have a Mistral API key available, making the end goal of the interview a bit unclear. The interviewer wrapped up the interview because of lack of time, and told me they would be in touch. - I received an email the next day telling me the interview process would not continue because my skills when it comes to using APIs were not meeting their expectations. Anyway, without being rude to anyone, most of this process felt like a waste of time. Interviewers were nice people overall, but speaking as someone with experience in tech recruitment, it did feel like each individual step's assessment goal is unclear at best.

      Domande di colloquio [2]

      Domanda 1

      - Describe what a RAG is?
      Rispondi alla domanda

      Domanda 2

      - If you have a 2000 page PDF document (i.e. something that does not fit in the context window) that serves as a knowledge base, would you rather fine tune a model or setup a RAG?
      Rispondi alla domanda
      10

      Altre recensioni di colloqui per Applied AI Engineer presso Mistral AI

      Colloquio per Applied AI Engineer

      8 mag 2026
      Dipendente anonimo
      Offerta accettata
      Esperienza positiva
      Colloquio nella media

      Candidatura

      Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Mistral AI

      Colloquio

      Very long process but a great learning journey. The prep materials were very deep and technical and a real joy to read. The interviewers were direct but very reasonable to talk to and I had very delightful conversations.

      Colloquio per Applied AI Engineer

      17 mar 2026
      Candidato anonimo a colloquio
      Nessuna offerta
      Esperienza negativa
      Colloquio facile

      Candidatura

      Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Mistral AI

      Colloquio

      The recruitment process was hindered by scheduling issues .. Every stage was cancelled and rescheduled multiple times and in one instance, no interviewer showed up for the scheduled slot. The technical stages consisted of a code review, an "LLM quiz," and a live coding session. The LLM quiz covered standard topics - transformer architectures, fine-tuning, and RAG, but the format was a rigid Q&A rather than a technical discussion. It felt as though the interviewer was looking for specific keywords from a prepared sheet rather than exploring depth of understanding. The live coding stage involved using an external API, but was difficult to navigate due to interviewer wifi problems. They joined 10 minutes late with a poor internet connection, which led to communication gaps and frustration when I asked for clarification on the task. The goals of the exercise were not clearly defined, and overall it was hard to understand what was expected. I received a rejection two weeks later via an automated email. The feedback suggested I "work on my deployment skills," which was confusing as deployment was not a component of any of the interview stages. Feels like a shame, I think Mistral may lose many good candidates with a process like this.

      Domande di colloquio [1]

      Domanda 1

      How do you evaluate RAG?
      Rispondi alla domanda

      Le migliori aziende per "stipendio e benefit" vicino a te

      avatar
      Deloitte
      3.5★Stipendio e benefit
      avatar
      KPMG
      3.6★Stipendio e benefit
      SelfEmployed.com
      3.9★Stipendio e benefit
      avatar
      Amazon
      3.7★Stipendio e benefit