Ho presentato la mia candidatura online. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso New Relic nel mese di ott 2024
Colloquio
After submitting my application I was asked to join a phone screen, sandard topics of conversation there (salary expectations, etc.). The second step was a technical interview. I met with three separate engineers.
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
Write a recursive b-tree traversal algorithm counting every Nth number in the Fibinacci sequence. I did not succeed.
Ho presentato la mia candidatura online. La procedura ha richiesto un giorno. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso New Relic
Colloquio
Had good coding conversation, thought process was clearly articulated and penned down clearly. In this age, if someone is still looking for syntax, symantics, it shows lack of technology adoption in the mindset and is stuck in oldschool. It didn't move forward, but sure there are no red flags. Not sure why there is rejection, interviewer doesn't seem to have any clue why he rejected. I had been interviewer, and I know how it bites back (be careful interviewers, look for clarity in thinking, avoid mindset not needed in this advanced tech era, If I remember too much syntax and symantics , I can jump boats continuosly, wont be loyal anywhere. )
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
Given API and its response time, just return max, min, average and mode of the api.
Ho presentato la mia candidatura online. La procedura ha richiesto più di una settimana. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso New Relic (Hyderabad) nel mese di nov 2024
Colloquio
Online test comprising of MCQ and coding. System design round and finally coding round.
I dont understand why some companies/ panels still rely so much on old school methods of interviewing where a problem from leetcode has to match their known solution otherwise you are rejected. It seems cramming has become the norm now and mediocrity is appreciated
