Ho presentato la mia candidatura online. La procedura ha richiesto una settimana. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Nutanix (San Jose, CA) nel mese di gen 2020
Colloquio
I was given 2 online coding questions and 90 mins to solve them both. They required access to my webcam and my screen. If I tried to open a new window a warning screen popped up telling me the test would end unless I closed the new window.
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
Number of ways to group 1's and 0's in an array & array manipulation.
Ho presentato la mia candidatura online. La procedura ha richiesto 4 mesi. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Nutanix (San Jose, CA) nel mese di gen 2020
Colloquio
Took the online assignment, one round of phone interview on glider, and went onsite in San Jose headquarter. The team were busy with other stuff, so I waited for almost 2 month to get the offer.
Ho presentato la mia candidatura online. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Nutanix nel mese di ott 2019
Colloquio
I got a challenge from glider.ai. It was a standard 90-minute, 2 question coding challenge. In the second question the starter code implemented the parsing of the input correctly. I switched tabs to google something in order to fix the starter code, then I was disqualified because I switched tabs. I understand that there have to be measures to enforce no cheating happens, but the quality/clarity of the questions and starter code was pathetic.
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
Basically it was how to find a cycle in an undirected graph. The problem specification was wildly vague and inconsistent. They used the term "loop" in the description and the term "cycle" in the starter code. The description also implied that two nodes can make a "loop", which is definitely not true. Again, this coding challenge was laughably bad and glider.ai needs to get their act together.
