3 rounds. very nice at first...then politically annoying because they made me interview multiple times with 4 to 5 hour long interviews leading to nothing....I think the company is currently going through a rough patch and trying to downsize while interviewing candidates to either 1. give the notion to current employees that they are always replaceable so they must do the job of multiple people and/or 2. to give the public the notion that they are not downsizing in any capacity because and they "are fine" because they are clearly taking interviews.....I was let down and felt like it was a fake process overall. I wasted my time. Perhaps it is not the best time currently to apply to Pfizer.

I had a disappointing interview experience during a panel interview with Ligand Binding Assay team in Pfizer. After being told following my second interview that I was “passionate and enthusiastic” and that I was being moved forward, I expected a collaborative and role focusing discussion. Instead, the panel interview felt more like an interrogation. Interviewers repeatedly went through my resume word for word, questioning minor details rather than discussing the role, team, or how my skills would contribute to the role until I asked them follow up questions. There was little opportunity for meaningful dialogue or to demonstrate technical depth beyond what was clearly stated on my resume. The experience gave the impression that the panel was more focused on extracting information rather than genuinely assessing fit. Additionally, after the interview, I followed up politely requesting feedback and did not receive any response, which felt unprofessional given the time and preparation invested. I would encourage future candidates to be prepared for very rigid questioning and limited discussion about growth, expectations, or team culture.