Interview was a joke. An amusing, but not quite funny joke. A waste of time. Structured in a way that I was asked an open ended question, we talked, and then the interviewer read me a long version of the answer he was expecting. There was a lot of time spent on him reading the information. It was curious and even fun to be a part of an interview like this. Something new for me. But it felt like I am being interviewed for a junior/internship position (I was supposedly interviewed for a senior position). The interviewer had a very thick french accent and at first I though he is not speaking english. I worked and lived abroad for many years, never any problem communicating. It took a minute to adapt but during the interview I didn’t understand around 10% what was being said and I gave up after asking many times to please repeat what was said. The person interviewing me was probably frustrated as I was, towards the end of interview he impatiently started finishing my sentences, putting words in my mouth, things I did not say or think. Rude and certainly not how I expect to be interviewed. Perhaps understandable because of our basic trouble to communicate. My sense was that the interviewer has worked in Unity only for a few years in a very narrow-focused manner and doesn’t understand his open ended questions feel more like an invitation to a dialog rather than inspiring a straightforward question (I got this sense from what I assume were expected answers he read after each question). He introduced himself as senior but I would put him in a mid-level level at best and I felt I have much deeper understanding of some of the topics than him. Not because I am special but because his answers do not match my experience in actually solving those very problems through a long period of time. He disagreed with some of my answers so I though great, I always look forward to learning something new. But it bugged me so much that I actually went to google my own answers after and turns out I wasn’t wrong (he was). But again, he felt rushed and I wonder if he even understood me what I was saying some of the time. After we were done, I felt pretty clear that the interview was a failure for both parties (possibly a candid camera situation gone bad) so I didn’t think about it until I received an email asking to schedule a time for feedback. I thought OK maybe they are experimenting with their interview process and want to ask for some feedback. A few weeks later we have the call. But no, on this call they never asked for feedback. On this call I received their opinions of me. That I never asked for. That felt strange. Don’t get me wrong, I savour feedback and think it is crucial component of working in groups. There is always ways to improve the workflow through being transparent. I do think that. But when we are both intent on NOT moving forward.. why insist on scheduling time for ‘feedback’? I found that curious. So here is my feedback to Popcore: Keep to proven interview formats and maybe use this format for junior/internship positions. Do make sure the person interviewing has more than sufficient spoken english qualities. If you expect a singular answer do not ask an open ended question - ask a concrete, specific problem to be solved (test are usually helpful here as well). This was an unusual, partly fun experience that I would like to not repeat.