Very strange criteria of reviewing test assignments? I did everything, code was clean and all the best practices respected, but they said the solution was to tangled. Later they sent me a detailed feedback. I disagree with many points there. I know some other people who also did a task and got a very strange rejection feedback, so think twice before you decide to spend around 10 hours or more of your time doing it

Call with recruiter, then got assignment to do. Assignment was reviewed by someone who does not know what they are doing (read script kiddie), and they rejected me. I have posted my solution to people who have created same libraries/technologies they got back to me as "not being done right" on both GitHub and reddit. Authors of these technologies promptly laughed at points they made to make me fail take home assignment. I would post links, but I would dox myself.