Ho presentato la mia candidatura online. La procedura ha richiesto 4 settimane. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Rippling
Colloquio
There were 4 rounds - coding, DS, system design and HM.
The SD round taken by Luvkush specifically was a very bad experience for me, because the interview was not engaging and helpful, and he asked a very specific question around his team's product. It took a lot of time to gain good context of the problem statement, and it did not look like a typical SD round. This was more of a LLD round, which I was not expecting. It looked like that only the candidates who have the context of their product would be able to crack it in a 1 hour round.
Very disappointed by the calibration of interview questions, should be asking a SD type of question which is a HLD based round.
But fortunately the interview panel gave me another chance to re-attempt the SD with a different interviewer. This time I did great and covered all the agreed-upon requirements (functional and non-functional). But surprisingly, the interviewer gave a negative feedback in the debrief mentioning that I missed some of the NFRs. I clearly remember that I took a signoff of all the requirements I'd be covered, and the interviewer never mentioned that they are looking for something else. This was very disheartening for me as I was expecting an offer.
Domande di colloquio [1]
Domanda 1
Asked a LLD type question in the SD round, which was specific to their team's product. Team needs to calibrate the questions well and it should be reviewed before asking such questions in the interview.
Ho presentato la mia candidatura online. La procedura ha richiesto 2 settimane. Ho sostenuto un colloquio presso Rippling (New York, NY) nel mese di apr 2024
Colloquio
The interviewer was right on time. I was asked pretty standard questions regarding my experience and then interviewer explained his experience. Then we moved to hackerrank question. The question was easy and I was able to solve it as well. It took me a little more than excepted. I was able to provide more alternatives of what would I have done if I had more time. But still got rejected. I guess at this time I am being compared to other candidates which in my opinion should not be the way someone should be evaluating candidates. It should be evaluated by set of things that a candidate was able to do.
